1 diqtatura ar niSnavs imas, rom romelime adamianis ufleba darRveulia.es niSnavs imas, rom erTi adamiani flobs mTlianad Zalauflebas 0 0 -6 256 konstitucionerma unda daicvas konstitucia da kanonebi, xoloCveulebrivma adamianma adamianurad unda icxovros 0 -5 1 634 Caideba konstituciaSi religia Tu ara, amas didi mniSvneloba ara aqvs.xar marTlmadidebeli da xa.r, iq ewereba Tu ara, amas mniSvneloba ara aqvs -1 -1 -6 054 dRes aris gansakuTrebuli momenti, amitom prezidentma unda aiRos TavisTavze pasuxisgebloba da mas unda hqondes gansakuTrebuligadawyvetilebis miRebis SesaZlebloba -5 0 6 -246
Marina MuskhelishviliCONSTITUTION AND ITS DISCOURSIVE LEGITIMATIONDescription of workshopWorkshop will consist of 8 two-hour meetings, held during 4 weeks.Week 1: 2 lectures will be devoted to theoretical concepts and approaches:1. Constitution and political institutions in their relationship with liberal, republican anddemocratic political traditions;2. Methodology of research: institutional vs. discursive approachesWeek 2: Case of Georgia, and research about Georgia – 2 lectures1. Case Study – Constitutional amendments of 20042. Political perceptions of Georgian population –discourse analysesWeek 3 – seminars. Specific aspects and issues will be considered; students will get betterunderstanding of specific problematic and will work out topics <strong>for</strong> their ownpresentations. They will also get consultancy and recommendations concerningadditional reading.Week 4: Presentations by students and discussions.Aims of WorkshopThe workshop is aiming to teach students creative fluency in methods of discourse analysesand to practices skills of independent research. Students should demonstrate the ability tocompare to each other concepts, which derive from different disciplines and the ability to usethem, when analyzing reality.EvaluationAttendance – 30%Participation and comprehension of theoretical concepts - 40%Presentation and essay – 30%Bibliography13. qrestomatia politikis TeoriaSi, romelic momzadda 2004 wels;14. John Druzek, “The In<strong>for</strong>mal Logic of Institutional Design”, in: Goodin R., (ed.) TheTheory of Institutional Design, CUP, 1990.15. Dryzek, John S. Holmes, Leslie, 2002, Post-communist Democratization. PoliticalDiscourses Across Thirteen Countries, New York: Cambridge University Press16. G.O'Donnell. 1998 Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies. Journal ofDemocracy, v.9, N.317. H. de Soto, The Mystery of Capital, Basik Books, 200018. Sartory, Giovanni. Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry intoStructures, Incentives and Outcomes. London, Macmillan, 199419. Bernard Manin, The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge UniversityPress, 199720. Jon Elster, Ways of constitution-making, in: Democracy’s Victory and Crisis, ed. byAxel Hadenius, Cambridge University Press, 199721. Th.Hnaf, Gh.Nodia. Georgia - Lurching to Democracy. From Agnostic Tolerance toPious Jacobinism: Societal Change and People's Reactions. NomosVerlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, 200022. Norberto Bobbio Democracy and Dictatorship23. Ronald Inglehart, Modernization and Postmodernization, Cultural, Economic andPolitical Change in 43 Societies, Princeton University Press, 199724. farid zaqaria, “araliberaluri talRis aRweveba”, sazogadoeba da politika, N3, CIPDD,Tbilisi, 200047