Richtlijn Sterilisatie van de vrouw - NVOG

ReferentieType studieKenmerken(studie/patiënten)Interventie (I)Uitkomstmaten enfollow-up duurResultatenBeoordelingkwaliteit studieBIJLAGE 2 Evidence tabel 2.1 Wat is meest optimale sterilisatie techniek, gelet op de veiligheid, complicaties enpijnbeleving van de procedure?Argueta, 1980CohortstudyprospectiveComparitive.No inclusion/exclustion criteria weredescribed.Sociodemographic characteristics weresimilar between the intervention groups.Mean age: 29 years.Mean parity: 4.Laparoscopic application ofspring loaded + Hulka clips vstubal rings.Outcomes:- Failure- Surgical time- Surgical difficulties- Pain- Postoperative complications andcomplaints- Gynaecological events up to 24months after surgery.- Pregnancy rate.The groups were similar for failure and surgical timeSurgical difficulties:Study groups clearly defined: (?)Selectionbias*: (-), randomisationAdequate assesment of exposure *:(+)Adequate assesment of outcomes*:(+)Assesor of the effect adequatelyblinded*: (-), but they did arandomisation for interventionSufficient length of follow-up*: (+),24 monthsSelective loss tofollow-up*: (-)Identification ofconfounders andcorrection in analysis: (?)Financial support: partialsupported.71