Kunskapsbaserat folkhälsoarbete Del 2 - Statens folkhälsoinstitut
Kunskapsbaserat folkhälsoarbete Del 2 - Statens folkhälsoinstitut
Kunskapsbaserat folkhälsoarbete Del 2 - Statens folkhälsoinstitut
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
56 <strong>Kunskapsbaserat</strong> <strong>folkhälsoarbete</strong> <strong>Del</strong> 2<br />
KOHORT<br />
Kvalitetsbedömning<br />
23. Beskrevs populationen bra? Ja Nej ......................................................<br />
24. Beskrevs interventionen bra? Ja Nej ......................................................<br />
Kommentar: ......................................................................................................................................<br />
............................................................................................................................................................<br />
25. Beskrevs urvalet och bakgrundspopulation? Ja Nej<br />
26. Beskrevs kriterier för att få intervention? Ja Nej<br />
27. Beskrevs om man annars exponerats? Ja Nej<br />
28. Fanns andra faktorer för exponering som inte tas upp? Ja Nej<br />
Kommentar: ......................................................................................................................................<br />
............................................................................................................................................................<br />
29. Var mätningarna av utfallet valida? Ja Nej<br />
30. Fanns reproducerbarhetstest? Ja Nej<br />
Kommentar: ......................................................................................................................................<br />
............................................................................................................................................................<br />
31. Var undersökningsperioden tillräckligt lång? Ja Nej<br />
32. Användes lämpliga statistiska test och var dessa rätt använda? Ja Nej<br />
Kommentar: ......................................................................................................................................<br />
............................................................................................................................................................<br />
33. Hur stort var bortfallet? ................................................................................................................<br />
34. Gjordes bortfallsanalys? Ja Nej<br />
Kommentar: ......................................................................................................................................<br />
............................................................................................................................................................<br />
35. Inkluderades bortfallet i analysen? Ja Nej<br />
36. Var kontroll av bias och confounders bra? Ja Nej<br />
37. Fanns ytterligare bias eller confounders? Ja Nej<br />
Kommentar: ......................................................................................................................................<br />
............................................................................................................................................................<br />
38. Andra viktiga begränsningar med studien ....................................................................................<br />
............................................................................................................................................................<br />
............................................................................................................................................................<br />
............................................................................................................................................................<br />
............................................................................................................................................................<br />
39. Kvalitetsbedömning Hög Medel Låg
Change language