SCREENING FOR LIVMODERHALSKRÆFT - Sundhedsstyrelsen
SCREENING FOR LIVMODERHALSKRÆFT - Sundhedsstyrelsen
SCREENING FOR LIVMODERHALSKRÆFT - Sundhedsstyrelsen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2<br />
http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/screening.html /marts 2007.<br />
3<br />
Espersen MM, Holten IW. Barrierer for screening for livmoderhalskræft. Ugeskr Læger<br />
2005; 167(46):4371-4374.<br />
4<br />
Schroll B, Holten I. Barrierer for screening i Norden. Kræftens Bekæmpelse, 2000.<br />
5<br />
Lidang M, Hariri J, Nielsen K, Svanholm H, Ejersbo D, Nielsen JF. Anbefalede retningslinjer<br />
for danske patologiafdelinger vedrørende kvalitetssikring af screening mod livmoderhalskraft.<br />
Dansk Selskab for Patologisk Anatomi og Cytologi, 2000.<br />
6<br />
Madsen EM. Smear-tagning. Ugeskr Læger 2004; 166:4246-47.<br />
7<br />
Ottesen B, Mogensen O, Forman A. Gynækologi 3. udgave. Munksgaard. København:<br />
2005.<br />
5. Præpareringsteknik<br />
1<br />
<strong>Sundhedsstyrelsen</strong>. Væskebaseret teknik og udstrygningsteknik anvendt til screening for<br />
livmoderhalskræft i Danmark – en medicinsk teknologivurdering. Medicinsk Teknologivurdering<br />
2005; 7(3) København: <strong>Sundhedsstyrelsen</strong>, Center for Evaluering og Medicinsk<br />
Teknologivurdering, 2005.<br />
http://www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2006/CEMTV/Cervix/Cervix_smfatn.pdf<br />
2<br />
Davey E, Barratt A, Irwing L, Chan S, Macaskill P, Mannes P, Saville AM. Effect of study<br />
design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquidbased<br />
versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review 2006; Lancet 367:122-<br />
132.<br />
6. Mikroskopi<br />
1<br />
Bolger N et al. Cervical Cytology: Implementation and Evaluation of a New Automated<br />
Interactive Image Analysis System. Acta Cytol 2006; 50:483-92.<br />
2<br />
Broadstock M. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of automated and semi-automated<br />
cervical screening devices. NZHTA (New Zealand Health Technology Assessment Clearing<br />
House). New Zealand. Oktober 2000.<br />
3<br />
Stevens MW, Milne AJ, Parkinson IH, Nespolon WW, Fazzalari NL, Arora N, Dodd TJ.<br />
Effectiveness of AutoPap System Location-Guided Screening in the Evaluation of Cervical<br />
Cytology Smears. Cytopathol 2004; 31:94-9.<br />
4<br />
Wilbur DC. Cervical cytology automation: an update for 2003. The end of the quest nears?.<br />
Clin Lab Med 2003; 23:755-74.<br />
5<br />
Willis BH, Barton P, Pearmain P, Bryan S, Hyde C. Cervical screening programmes: can<br />
automation help? Evidence from systematic reviews, an economic analysis and a<br />
simulation modelling exercise applied to the UK. Health technol Assess 2005; 9:1-222.<br />
Screening for livmoderhalskræft – anbefalinger, september 2007 64
Change language