Vom Verbot zur Gleichberechtigung - Hirschfeld-Eddy-Stiftung
Vom Verbot zur Gleichberechtigung - Hirschfeld-Eddy-Stiftung
Vom Verbot zur Gleichberechtigung - Hirschfeld-Eddy-Stiftung
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
04 | From the Aktion Standesamt via the Registered Partnership to Full Access<br />
to the Institution of Marriage<br />
partnerships on August 1, 2001 could thus no longer be stopped. This, however, did not<br />
mean that equal rights were attained. On the contrary, now a phase of legal proceedings<br />
and hard-fought improvements regarding the details began.<br />
In addition, on July 17, 2002, the Federal Constitutional Court explained to the governments<br />
of Bavaria, Saxony and Thuringia, the plaintiffs in a case, that the introduction of<br />
a new institution was by no means unconstitutional. On the contrary – the court made it<br />
clear that the constitution did not foresee any “mandated differentiation” between registered<br />
partnerships and marriage. “The special protection of the institution of marriage<br />
in Art. 6, paragraph 1 of the Basic Law does not prevent lawmakers from foreseeing<br />
rights and obligations for same sex partnerships, which are the same or very similar to<br />
those pertaining to marriage.“ 9 The path for further alignment was thus blazed. In 2005,<br />
the red-green coalition in the German Bundestag ratified the Law Revising the Life Partnership<br />
Act, which also foresaw the same rights in relation to statutory old-age insurance<br />
and survivor’s benefits. The option of adopting a stepchild was also conceded, a<br />
measure specifically intended to counteract discrimination against the children of rainbow<br />
families. Initially, the joint-adoption of a third-party child was prohibited. An additional<br />
draft law, intended to establish equality in relation to a number of rights, and<br />
which included regulations that required approval, could not be deliberated due to the<br />
premature end of the legislative period.<br />
With the end of the red-green coalition, the dynamic legal policy reform process was<br />
also temporarily interrupted. Since then, progress has mainly been achieved under pressure<br />
from the Federal Constitutional Court. While the federal government has mainly<br />
been blocked by the veto of the CDU/CSU faction, couples still fighting for equality have<br />
lodged suits in various courts in order to do away with individual inequality. The LSVD,<br />
and especially Manfred Bruns, has offered them active support by providing expertise<br />
and by writing statements. And this has been successful; in a decision handed down on<br />
July 7, 2009, the Federal Constitutional Court made the landmark decision that simply<br />
referring to a mandate to protect marriage according to Art. 6 of the Basic Law could not<br />
justify disadvantaging registered partnerships in relation to marriage. Thus, it was again<br />
confirmed that there is no “mandated differentiation” in relation to marriage. On the<br />
contrary, all discrimination between registered partnerships and marriage must be objectively<br />
justified. 10 In comparable circumstances, equality is constitutionally mandated.<br />
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................<br />
5 “Das Recht, anders zu leben,“ Interview in: Die Zeit, No. 40/1999. | 6 BT-Drucksache 14/3751. | 7 Cf. BT-Plenarprotokoll<br />
14/131. | 8 BT-Plenarprotokoll 14/115, p. 10966f. | 9 BVerfGE 103, 313. | 10 1 BvR 1164/07 RN 105.<br />
79