22.02.2013 Views

The Prius That Shook.. - VFAQ Prius Site

The Prius That Shook.. - VFAQ Prius Site

The Prius That Shook.. - VFAQ Prius Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was electronically controlled, another was partially<br />

mechanically controlled, and the other was controlled with a<br />

CVT.<br />

If the emphasis was to begin production as soon as<br />

possible, the mechanical control method was the best choice<br />

by far because of previous knowledge and experience. <strong>The</strong><br />

CVT control system also was a good choice because it<br />

already had been built once for the 1995 Motor Show.<br />

On the other hand, Toyota had little experience with<br />

electronic control. One had been developed for EVs so there<br />

were some prospects for success, but it was not cost effective,<br />

because it needed two motors and an inverter.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was hope that electronic controls eventually<br />

would become much cheaper to produce since ICs, such as<br />

semiconductors, were dramatically getting more powerful.<br />

<strong>The</strong> control unit itself would be compact because it would<br />

be controlled only with a decelerator, without a transmission.<br />

In addition, there was a possibility that electronic control<br />

systems would be used in future FCEVs, as well as in hybrid<br />

vehicles.<br />

Discussions to select one of the three systems continued<br />

but the three engineers who were in charge of the three<br />

systems were beginning to develop a bias towards their own<br />

system.<br />

Matsui, who had built the second and already<br />

disqualified system, had been assigned to BR-VF from the<br />

Drive Train Engineering Division. Born in Osaka, he<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!