Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...
Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...
Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
108 SKIES AT NIGHT ARE BIG AND BRIGHT<br />
long, dark shaft. But we must be fair <strong>and</strong> look at the disadvantages<br />
as well.<br />
There is one big one, <strong>and</strong> it’s a deal-killer. Ironically, we looked<br />
at it as an advantage before: the narrow opening of the chimney.<br />
Before, it was good because it cut out glow <strong>from</strong> the sky, increasing<br />
contrast, making it easier to see stars. However, the small<br />
opening means there’s less of a chance of a bright star passing into<br />
your field of view.<br />
Most people think of the sky as being filled with stars. That’s<br />
an illusion. You can see roughly 10,000 stars with the unaided eye,<br />
<strong>and</strong> they’re spread out over the entire sky. We can estimate the<br />
average number of stars you might see through the opening at the<br />
top of a chimney. The answer may surprise you: even with a big<br />
opening, you will usually see only about 10 to 20 stars on the very<br />
darkest <strong>and</strong> clearest of nights. On a more typical night you might<br />
only see one or two stars. So, actually, looking through a chimney<br />
makes it a lot harder to see stars even at night. You are cutting out<br />
so much of the sky that only a few stars can be seen through the<br />
narrow aperture. During the day the odds are far, far worse. There<br />
are only six objects that you can see during the day to start with,<br />
not 10,000. The odds of one of these being in the chimney opening<br />
are remote indeed.<br />
Scientists, of course, don’t usually just calculate a number <strong>and</strong><br />
assume it’s correct. They actually go out <strong>and</strong> test it. An astronomer<br />
named J. Allen Hynek did just that <strong>and</strong> published his results in an<br />
issue of Sky <strong>and</strong> Telescope (no. 10 [1951]: 61). One day he took a<br />
few members of his astronomy class to an ab<strong>and</strong>oned smokestack<br />
near Ohio University, where he taught. The bright star Vega—the<br />
fourth brightest in the sky—passes very close to directly overhead<br />
at that latitude, <strong>and</strong> they timed their experiment so that it would<br />
be in their field of view <strong>from</strong> the bottom of the smokestack. Vega<br />
is about half as bright as should be possible to see according to<br />
our calculations, but it is still one of the brightest stars in the sky.<br />
If it cannot be seen during the day, then certainly the vast majority<br />
of stars cannot be seen then, either.<br />
At the appointed time Hynek <strong>and</strong> his students peered upwards,<br />
straining to see a glimmer <strong>from</strong> the star, but they all failed to observe