Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...
Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...
Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
160 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE<br />
Some people claim that this still won’t work because actually<br />
the Earth’s air absorbs starlight, making them fainter, so stars<br />
should look brighter <strong>from</strong> the surface of the Moon. That’s not correct;<br />
it’s a myth that air absorbs a lot of starlight. Actually, our<br />
atmosphere is amazingly transparent to the light we see with our<br />
eyes, <strong>and</strong> it lets almost all the visible light through. I chatted with<br />
two-time Space Shuttle astronaut <strong>and</strong> professional astronomer Ron<br />
Parise about this. I asked him if he sees more stars when he’s in<br />
space, <strong>and</strong> he told me that he could barely see them at all. He had<br />
to turn off all the lights inside the Shuttle to even glimpse the stars,<br />
<strong>and</strong> even then the red lights <strong>from</strong> the control panels reflected in the<br />
glass, making viewing the stars difficult. Being outside the Earth’s<br />
atmosphere doesn’t make the stars appear any brighter at all.<br />
The accusation made by the hoax-believers about stars in the<br />
Apollo photographs at first may sound pretty damning, but in reality<br />
it has a very simple explanation. If the believers had asked any<br />
professional photographer or, better yet, any of the hundreds of<br />
thous<strong>and</strong>s of amateur astronomers in the world, they would have<br />
received the explanation easily <strong>and</strong> simply. They also could easily<br />
prove it for themselves with a camera.<br />
I am frankly amazed that conspiracy theorists would put this<br />
bit of silliness forward as evidence at all, let alone make it their<br />
biggest point. In reality, it’s the easiest of their arguments to prove<br />
wrong. Yet they still cling to it.<br />
2. Surviving the Radiation of Space<br />
In 1958 the United States launched a satellite named Explorer 1.<br />
Among its many discoveries, it found that there was a zone of<br />
intense radiation above the Earth, starting at about 600 kilometers<br />
(375 miles) above the surface. University of Iowa physicist James<br />
Van Allen was the first to correctly interpret this radiation: it was<br />
composed of particles <strong>from</strong> the Sun’s solar wind trapped in the<br />
Earth’s magnetic field. Like a bar magnet attracting iron filings, the<br />
Earth’s magnetic field captures these energetic protons <strong>and</strong> electrons<br />
<strong>from</strong> the Sun’s wind, keeping them confined to a doughnutshaped<br />
series of belts ranging as high as 65,000 kilometers (40,000<br />
miles) above the Earth. These zones of radiation were subsequently<br />
named the Van Allen belts.