22.02.2013 Views

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE<br />

Some people claim that this still won’t work because actually<br />

the Earth’s air absorbs starlight, making them fainter, so stars<br />

should look brighter <strong>from</strong> the surface of the Moon. That’s not correct;<br />

it’s a myth that air absorbs a lot of starlight. Actually, our<br />

atmosphere is amazingly transparent to the light we see with our<br />

eyes, <strong>and</strong> it lets almost all the visible light through. I chatted with<br />

two-time Space Shuttle astronaut <strong>and</strong> professional astronomer Ron<br />

Parise about this. I asked him if he sees more stars when he’s in<br />

space, <strong>and</strong> he told me that he could barely see them at all. He had<br />

to turn off all the lights inside the Shuttle to even glimpse the stars,<br />

<strong>and</strong> even then the red lights <strong>from</strong> the control panels reflected in the<br />

glass, making viewing the stars difficult. Being outside the Earth’s<br />

atmosphere doesn’t make the stars appear any brighter at all.<br />

The accusation made by the hoax-believers about stars in the<br />

Apollo photographs at first may sound pretty damning, but in reality<br />

it has a very simple explanation. If the believers had asked any<br />

professional photographer or, better yet, any of the hundreds of<br />

thous<strong>and</strong>s of amateur astronomers in the world, they would have<br />

received the explanation easily <strong>and</strong> simply. They also could easily<br />

prove it for themselves with a camera.<br />

I am frankly amazed that conspiracy theorists would put this<br />

bit of silliness forward as evidence at all, let alone make it their<br />

biggest point. In reality, it’s the easiest of their arguments to prove<br />

wrong. Yet they still cling to it.<br />

2. Surviving the Radiation of Space<br />

In 1958 the United States launched a satellite named Explorer 1.<br />

Among its many discoveries, it found that there was a zone of<br />

intense radiation above the Earth, starting at about 600 kilometers<br />

(375 miles) above the surface. University of Iowa physicist James<br />

Van Allen was the first to correctly interpret this radiation: it was<br />

composed of particles <strong>from</strong> the Sun’s solar wind trapped in the<br />

Earth’s magnetic field. Like a bar magnet attracting iron filings, the<br />

Earth’s magnetic field captures these energetic protons <strong>and</strong> electrons<br />

<strong>from</strong> the Sun’s wind, keeping them confined to a doughnutshaped<br />

series of belts ranging as high as 65,000 kilometers (40,000<br />

miles) above the Earth. These zones of radiation were subsequently<br />

named the Van Allen belts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!