22.02.2013 Views

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WORLDS IN DERISION 179<br />

do now for the past billion or two years at least. If there have been<br />

any disturbances, they certainly have not occurred in the past few<br />

millennia.<br />

Velikovsky spends quite some time in Worlds in Collision trying<br />

to show that Venus was ejected by Jupiter. He is wrong; such<br />

an event simply could not happen. It can be shown mathematically<br />

that the amount of energy needed to eject Venus would have literally<br />

vaporized the planet! In other words, whatever type of event<br />

Velikovsky envisioned to shoot Venus out of Jupiter actually would<br />

have turned Venus into a very hot, inc<strong>and</strong>escent gas, exploding outwards<br />

like, well, an explosion. It certainly would not have formed<br />

a solid body able to roam the solar system. This seriously weakens<br />

his argument about Venus w<strong>and</strong>ering the solar system, unless you<br />

believe in truly immense forces having incredibly benign effects.<br />

It would be like dropping an anvil on an egg <strong>and</strong> winding up with<br />

two perfectly split egg shells, one with the white inside <strong>and</strong> the other<br />

with the yolk. When forces are that huge, they rarely clean up after<br />

themselves so neatly. In reality, the egg would be a goopy mess, just<br />

as Venus would be by whatever forces Velikovsky was imagining.<br />

Still, let’s grant that some mysterious unknown force set Venus<br />

in motion. So, ignoring the genesis of Venus, is it still possible that<br />

it somehow passed so close to the Earth that it caused widespread<br />

disaster here?<br />

In a word: no.<br />

From his readings Velikovsky concludes that Venus passed close<br />

enough to the Earth to stop its rotation, moved off, then came back<br />

a few hours later <strong>and</strong> started the Earth moving again. However, he<br />

is very vague about the exact mechanism for this. He theorizes that<br />

perhaps the Earth didn’t really slow <strong>and</strong> stop, but instead it flipped<br />

over on its axis, making the north pole become the south pole <strong>and</strong><br />

vice versa.<br />

Indeed, he spends dozens of pages giving evidence that the<br />

Earth didn’t always spin with the north pole in the position it is<br />

now. He starts a chapter about this as follows: “Our planet rotates<br />

<strong>from</strong> west to east. Has it always done so?” He quotes ancient texts<br />

as saying that the Earth has flipped not just once, but many times.<br />

His basis for this is pretty shaky. One passage he quotes talks<br />

about two drawings of constellations found in an Egyptian tomb.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!