22.02.2013 Views

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MARS IS IN THE SEVENTH HOUSE 217<br />

Mind you, the shapes of these constellations are arbitrary as<br />

well. Libra looks like a diamond only because of where we are relative<br />

to those four stars. Those stars are at all different distances,<br />

<strong>and</strong> only appear to be a diamond. If we had a three-dimensional<br />

view, they wouldn’t look to be in that shape at all.<br />

And it gets worse. Some stars in the zodiacal signs are supergiants<br />

<strong>and</strong> will someday explode. Antares, the red heart of Scorpius,<br />

is one of these supergiants. Someday it will become a supernova,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Scorpius will be left with a hole in its chest. How do we<br />

interpret the constellation then?<br />

PPP<br />

Apologists for astrology, like many who defend a pseudoscience,<br />

try to distract critics rather than actually argue relevant points.<br />

Many astrologers point out that astronomy <strong>and</strong> astrology used to<br />

be the same thing, as if once having been part of a physical science<br />

legitimizes astrology. That’s silly. That hamburger I ate the other<br />

day was once part of a cow; that doesn’t make me a four-legged<br />

ruminant, <strong>and</strong> it doesn’t make the cow any more human.<br />

Another classic astrology defense argues that many famous<br />

astronomers were practicing astrologers: Kepler, Brahe, Copernicus.<br />

Notice that the list features astronomers <strong>from</strong> a few hundred<br />

years ago. In the end, this argument is just as fallacious as the previous<br />

one. Astronomers <strong>from</strong> centuries past didn’t have the scientific<br />

basis for astronomy as a physical science that we now have,<br />

<strong>and</strong>, indeed, Kepler was the key person in making that happen.<br />

They were still steeped in tradition. Also, it’s not clear if Kepler<br />

believed in astrology; he was being paid by a king who did, <strong>and</strong><br />

he was certainly smart enough to underst<strong>and</strong> who buttered his<br />

bread.<br />

Astrologers go on to talk about the large number of people<br />

who believe in <strong>and</strong> practice it. Is the majority always right? Fact is<br />

fact, unswayed by how many people believe in a falsehood or how<br />

fervently they defend it.<br />

Yet astrology is still popular, despite all these devastating claims<br />

against it. Why? What weapon do astrologers wield that wipes out<br />

all rational <strong>and</strong> critical claims against them? It turns out their best<br />

weapon is us.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!