22.02.2013 Views

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE<br />

The same thing is happening in the lunar photographs. The<br />

shadows don’t appear to be parallel because of perspective. When<br />

comparing the directions of shadows <strong>from</strong> two objects at very different<br />

distances, perspective effects can be quite large. I have seen<br />

this myself, by st<strong>and</strong>ing near a tall street lamp around sunset <strong>and</strong><br />

comparing its shadow to that of one across the street. The two<br />

shadows appear to point in two very different directions. It’s actually<br />

a pretty weird thing to see.<br />

Again, this is something that can be investigated quite literally<br />

in your front yard, <strong>and</strong> is hardly evidence of a multibillion-dollar<br />

conspiracy.<br />

PPP<br />

There’s an interesting lesson here about the claims of the hoaxbelievers.<br />

In many cases they use simple physics <strong>and</strong> common sense to<br />

make their points. Usually their initial points make sense. However,<br />

they tend to misunderst<strong>and</strong> physics, <strong>and</strong> common sense may<br />

not apply on the airless surface of an alien world. Upon closer<br />

inspection, their arguments invariably fall apart.<br />

I could go on <strong>and</strong> on with more examples. Debunking the<br />

hoax-believers’ claims could fill a book. That’s not surprising, considering<br />

several books have been written by them. I have no doubt<br />

the books sell well. Conspiracy books always do. I also have no<br />

doubt that a book dedicated to debunking them would not sell<br />

well. A whole book pointing out the believers’ errors would be<br />

tedious, <strong>and</strong> it isn’t necessary. The examples above are the strongest<br />

they can muster, <strong>and</strong> they fall apart easily when shaken. Their<br />

other arguments are even weaker.<br />

But the interesting part is the seeming simplicity of their claims.<br />

Not seeing stars in the Apollo pictures is so obvious, so basic a<br />

mistake. The other arguments they make seem obvious as well.<br />

But let’s a have small sanity check here. Let’s say NASA knew<br />

it couldn’t put men on the Moon, <strong>and</strong> knew it would lose all its<br />

money if it didn’t. They decided to fake the whole lunar project.<br />

They built elaborate sets, hired hundreds of technicians, cameramen,<br />

scientists knowledgeable enough to fake all this, <strong>and</strong> eventually<br />

spent millions or billions of dollars on the hoax. Eventually,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!