23.03.2013 Views

Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children

Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children

Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Selection criteria <strong>of</strong> demonstrating an ability to<br />

successfully establish can prevent particularly<br />

needy refugees from being selected.<br />

—<strong>Canadian</strong> Council <strong>for</strong> Refugees 43<br />

Because priority should be given to <strong>the</strong> most<br />

vulnerable, we recommend that <strong>the</strong> likelihood<br />

<strong>of</strong> successful establishment in Canada not be a<br />

requirement.<br />

—Immigration Legislative Review Advisory<br />

Group 44<br />

On those occasions when refugees with “greater needs”<br />

are selected, <strong>the</strong> numbers are usually small. For example,<br />

Quebec annually accepts five claimants with physical<br />

disabilities and gives priority to those with <strong>the</strong> most<br />

minor disability. 45<br />

The Minister <strong>of</strong> Immigration and Citizenship Canada is<br />

now proposing to “shift <strong>the</strong> balance toward protection<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> ability to settle successfully in selecting<br />

refugees.” 46<br />

In cases where assistance by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> government or<br />

sponsorship by a <strong>Canadian</strong> group is arranged, assistance<br />

can include “housing, food, clothing, incidental expenses,<br />

community orientation, help in finding a job and some<br />

support in dealing with <strong>the</strong> challenges <strong>of</strong> settling in a new<br />

country.” 47<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r discriminatory element <strong>of</strong> Canada’s refugee<br />

system is that in some cases, a refugee may not be<br />

admitted because <strong>the</strong> refugee “might reasonably be<br />

expected to cause excessive demands,... on health or<br />

prescribed social services.” 48<br />

H O W D O E S C A N A D A M E A S U R E U P ?<br />

107<br />

The Immigration Legislative Review Advisory Group said<br />

it was inappropriate “to require that persons in need <strong>of</strong><br />

protection or <strong>the</strong>ir families meet <strong>the</strong> requirements<br />

regarding excessive costs <strong>for</strong> health services.” 52<br />

Citizenship and Immigration Canada recently<br />

acknowledged that “<strong>the</strong> current excessive demands<br />

provision as applied to spouses and dependent children is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten perceived as inhumane, and <strong>the</strong> decision-making<br />

process slow. A significant number <strong>of</strong> refusals <strong>of</strong> spouses<br />

and dependent children on excessive demands grounds are<br />

overturned ei<strong>the</strong>r on appeal to <strong>the</strong> Immigration Appeal<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Immigration and Refugee Board or on<br />

humanitarian or on compassionate grounds when a<br />

Minister’s permit is issued.” The department says that<br />

“fur<strong>the</strong>r research is being undertaken to assess <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> excessive demands provision” and that<br />

“discussions with provincial and territorial governments<br />

will take place.” 53<br />

Claiming Refugee Status<br />

in Canada<br />

The fundamental weaknesses in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong><br />

refugee determination system lie at <strong>the</strong> beginning<br />

and end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process, ra<strong>the</strong>r than in <strong>the</strong> refugee<br />

determination itself. Barriers to access to <strong>the</strong><br />

system mean that refugees in need <strong>of</strong> protection<br />

are never allowed to be heard by <strong>the</strong> Immigration<br />

and Refugee Board. At <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r end, claimants<br />

who are refused status are not given a fair<br />

opportunity to have <strong>the</strong> decision reconsidered or<br />

have o<strong>the</strong>r reasons <strong>for</strong> fearing removal reviewed.<br />

—<strong>Canadian</strong> Council <strong>for</strong> Refugees 54<br />

What are excessive demands on health or social services?<br />

These medical requirements <strong>for</strong> permanent residence status deny a disabled person, whe<strong>the</strong>r he or she is in Canada<br />

or abroad, from becoming a permanent resident. 49 In Yogeswaran v. Canada (Minister <strong>of</strong> Citizenship and Immigration)<br />

(1997): 50<br />

The applicant sought to review a decision <strong>of</strong> a visa <strong>of</strong>ficer refusing his application <strong>for</strong> permanent residence<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> medical inadmissibility <strong>of</strong> his 11-year-old dependent son. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> medical doctors who<br />

provided <strong>the</strong> respondent with <strong>the</strong> opinion stated that <strong>the</strong> key social service that <strong>the</strong> boy would require was<br />

a placement in special education classes.... There was sufficient evidence be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> medical <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>m to determine that <strong>the</strong> admission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dependent’s son would cause excessive demands on social<br />

services and <strong>the</strong> court was satisfied that education is a social service. Given that this was a medical opinion<br />

being given by <strong>the</strong> medical <strong>of</strong>ficers, it was not reasonable to expect a full examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> social<br />

services in such an opinion. Excessive demand means more than normal. The application <strong>for</strong> judicial review<br />

was dismissed. 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!