Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children
Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children
Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
C A N A D I A N C O A L I T I O N F O R T H E R I G H T S O F C H I L D R E N<br />
Tyrell’s fa<strong>the</strong>r was screening medical in<strong>for</strong>mation, Tyrell was not a<br />
mature minor. That ruling was contentious, particularly since <strong>the</strong><br />
treatment Tyrell was to receive was very aggressive. 3<br />
There are many unresolved issues in Canada around <strong>the</strong> fundamental<br />
freedoms. Are <strong>the</strong>se rights inherent or do <strong>the</strong>y need to be earned? What<br />
are reasonable limits? How can rights in <strong>the</strong> private sphere be monitored?<br />
How are community/school standards determined? Is <strong>the</strong> right to have<br />
blue hair trivial? Is a child’s right to fundamental freedoms really<br />
important as compared to o<strong>the</strong>r issues, such as poverty?<br />
There has been little discussion <strong>of</strong> children’s fundamental freedoms in<br />
Canada. The freedoms are enshrined in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> constitution <strong>for</strong><br />
“everyone,” but not specifically <strong>for</strong> children. It is difficult to know what<br />
emphasis is placed on teaching children about <strong>the</strong>ir fundamental freedoms<br />
in <strong>the</strong> schools as in<strong>for</strong>mation is scarce and difficult to compare. Few<br />
concrete examples <strong>of</strong> initiatives expressly designed to promote freedoms<br />
<strong>for</strong> children have been identified.<br />
Most infringments on children’s freedoms are dealt with in<strong>for</strong>mally at<br />
school or in <strong>the</strong> home. Few children have <strong>the</strong> resources to challenge<br />
infringements on <strong>the</strong>ir rights. John Drapper, an Ontario high school<br />
student with a physical disability that, in his words, makes him “totally<br />
dependent on o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>for</strong> all aspects <strong>of</strong> my care,” says that:<br />
As a young person I usually have little or no opportunity to<br />
address discrimination. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> time, adults don’t respond<br />
well to a kid questioning <strong>the</strong>ir decisions. If you approach <strong>the</strong><br />
Human <strong>Rights</strong> Commission in Ontario, <strong>the</strong>y’re swamped and<br />
usually don’t get to your concern <strong>for</strong> years. So I don’t bo<strong>the</strong>r.<br />
If you really want to pursue discrimination, you need to go to<br />
court and that costs money (my allowance is $11 per week). 4<br />
Defining The Freedoms<br />
Freedom <strong>of</strong> expression<br />
The <strong>Canadian</strong> Charter <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> and Freedoms does not explain freedom<br />
<strong>of</strong> expression in as detailed a manner as <strong>the</strong> Convention. In 1989,<br />
however, <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> Canada (Irwin Toy v. Quebec5 ) held that<br />
“any activity is expressive if it attempts to convey a meaning.” This<br />
definition is so broad that it would appear to include <strong>the</strong> right to seek and<br />
receive in<strong>for</strong>mation. One clear restriction to this right is expressive<br />
activity that takes <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> criminal activity. 6<br />
Freedom <strong>of</strong> thought, conscience and religion<br />
Nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Convention nor <strong>the</strong> Charter defines freedom <strong>of</strong> religion. The<br />
Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> Canada, in R. v. Big M Drug Mart (1985), 7 defined it as<br />
follows:<br />
28<br />
Voices<br />
<strong>Coalition</strong> Questionnaire:<br />
If a youth from ano<strong>the</strong>r country<br />
asked you to describe <strong>the</strong> many<br />
things you are free to do in Canada,<br />
what would you say?<br />
I would tell <strong>the</strong>m we have a<br />
Charter <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> that secures<br />
<strong>the</strong> many things I am free to do<br />
here in Canada. I am free to say<br />
what I want about anything.<br />
About <strong>the</strong> government, my<br />
school, my parents or anywhere<br />
else I know. I am also free to do<br />
what I want and think <strong>the</strong> way I<br />
want. But I would also tell him<br />
some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> limits. Such as hate.<br />
I am free to say what I want, do<br />
what I want and think <strong>the</strong> way I<br />
want as long as I do not promote<br />
hate to o<strong>the</strong>rs or hurt o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />
My o<strong>the</strong>r limit is <strong>the</strong> law. If<br />
what I say, do or think violates<br />
<strong>the</strong> law, I am not allowed by <strong>the</strong><br />
country to do so but most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
time I won’t get killed <strong>for</strong> it like<br />
some people in o<strong>the</strong>r countries.<br />
— Medin, aged 16, Ontario<br />
We all have <strong>the</strong> right to speak<br />
and express ourselves but we<br />
must respect <strong>the</strong> opinion <strong>of</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs. (translated)<br />
— Normand, aged 16, Quebec<br />
You are free to express yourself<br />
without <strong>of</strong>fending someone else.<br />
You are free to dress and act<br />
<strong>the</strong> way you want without being<br />
<strong>of</strong>fensive. You are free to have a<br />
different mixture <strong>of</strong> friends.<br />
You are free to believe in what<br />
you want without inflicting your<br />
beliefs on someone else.<br />
— Madelena, aged 16, Ontario