23.03.2013 Views

Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children

Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children

Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• 64 percent were identified as having one or more<br />

disabilities or diagnoses;<br />

• 35 percent had developmental disabilities;<br />

• abuse (39 percent) and neglect (42 percent) were <strong>the</strong><br />

main reasons <strong>for</strong> being taken into care, while seven<br />

percent were in care as a direct result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disability;<br />

• Aboriginal children were two-and-a-half times as<br />

likely to have Fetal Alcohol Syndrome/Fetal Alcohol<br />

Effect compared to Caucasian children, while<br />

Caucasian children were 50 percent more likely than<br />

Aboriginal children to have Attention Deficit<br />

Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder or<br />

to be mentally ill. 81<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> recommendations <strong>for</strong> future planning, <strong>the</strong><br />

report called <strong>for</strong> better training <strong>of</strong> child welfare and<br />

protection workers about <strong>the</strong> specific needs <strong>of</strong> children<br />

with disabilities and <strong>the</strong> need to make Aboriginal<br />

children a priority. 82<br />

Aboriginal <strong>Children</strong> with Disabilities<br />

According to Statistics Canada’s 1991 Aboriginal<br />

Peoples Survey, 31 percent <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal <strong>Canadian</strong>s have<br />

a disability, which is more than twice <strong>the</strong> national<br />

average. 83 The disability rate among <strong>the</strong> Aboriginal<br />

population between <strong>the</strong> ages <strong>of</strong> 15 to 34 was 23 percent,<br />

compared to eight percent among <strong>the</strong> general<br />

population. 84 Reasons <strong>for</strong> this disparity include unsafe<br />

living conditions, poverty, pollution and contaminants in<br />

<strong>the</strong> food chain. 85<br />

The federal government provides services to status<br />

Indians on reserve and to <strong>the</strong> Inuit, while <strong>the</strong> provinces<br />

provide services to Indians living <strong>of</strong>f reserve, non-status<br />

Indians and Métis. There is also some service provision<br />

by community organizations, such as Alberta’s three<br />

Aboriginal disability organizations. 86 Despite <strong>the</strong> large<br />

number <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal people affected by disability,<br />

service delivery is consistently poor or non-existent in<br />

Aboriginal communities. 87 Many Aboriginal people live<br />

in rural or remote areas, so access to community-based<br />

services is even more difficult. 88<br />

Jurisdictional issues also complicate health and social<br />

service delivery to Aboriginal children with disabilities.<br />

Provincial governments have refused to provide services<br />

to Aboriginal people on reserve and <strong>the</strong> federal<br />

government does not provide all <strong>the</strong> necessary services. 89<br />

In 1992, <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Indian Affairs and Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Development admitted that it is not doing an adequate<br />

H O W D O E S C A N A D A M E A S U R E U P ?<br />

63<br />

job in this area and that <strong>the</strong> demand <strong>for</strong> services is<br />

expected to increase. 90 In 1993, <strong>the</strong> federal Standing<br />

Committee on Human <strong>Rights</strong> and Disabled Persons<br />

observed that both levels <strong>of</strong> government appear to have<br />

<strong>for</strong>gotten <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal people and that <strong>the</strong><br />

“lack <strong>of</strong> clear departmental responsibilities, an absence<br />

<strong>of</strong> strong program structures, fragmented service<br />

development and inconsistent standards are all too<br />

evident, despite sincere intentions.” 91<br />

The Committee also expressed concern about a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

federal attention to <strong>the</strong> people most affected by its<br />

programs. The Department <strong>of</strong> Indian Affairs and<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Development did not consult Aboriginal people<br />

about its five-year National Strategy <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Integration<br />

<strong>of</strong> Persons with Disabilities, which was launched in<br />

1991. 92 The Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples<br />

recommended major structural changes to facilitate <strong>the</strong><br />

participation <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal people in its 1996 report. 93<br />

The Federal Task Force on Disability Issues also<br />

recommended that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> government:<br />

...recognize <strong>the</strong> ways in which it has<br />

contributed to jurisdictional complexities that<br />

prevent Aboriginal <strong>Canadian</strong>s with disabilities<br />

from gaining access to <strong>the</strong> supports and<br />

services <strong>the</strong>y need and begin to work in<br />

collaboration with provincial governments and<br />

Aboriginal communities to provide flexible,<br />

client-centred services and supports to<br />

Aboriginal <strong>Canadian</strong>s with disabilities. 94<br />

The Standing Committee on Human <strong>Rights</strong> and<br />

Disabled Persons says that in addition to <strong>the</strong> transfer<br />

<strong>of</strong> administrative responsibility <strong>for</strong> health and social<br />

services from federal authorities to reserves, Aboriginal<br />

community leaders must have in<strong>for</strong>mation about and<br />

prioritize <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> persons with disabilities in <strong>the</strong><br />

reserve community. 95<br />

Access to Services<br />

Services that promote <strong>the</strong> independence and participation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> child with disabilities include education, training<br />

and preparation <strong>for</strong> employment, health care and<br />

rehabilitation, and play and recreation.<br />

Education<br />

In <strong>the</strong> 1994 Salamanca Statement on Principles, Policy<br />

and Practice in Special Needs Education, international

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!