23.03.2013 Views

Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children

Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children

Poste - Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C A N A D I A N C O A L I T I O N F O R T H E R I G H T S O F C H I L D R E N<br />

cooperation, as was recommended to Canada by <strong>the</strong> UN<br />

Committee on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Child in 1995. There is<br />

no clear relationship between CIDA’s strategy <strong>for</strong> children<br />

and <strong>the</strong> general principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Convention, nor are <strong>the</strong>re<br />

specific development objectives related to <strong>the</strong> promotion<br />

and protection <strong>of</strong> children’s rights and <strong>the</strong> participation <strong>of</strong><br />

children in development programs.<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> NGOs have expressed concern about a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

awareness by CIDA staff <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Convention and <strong>the</strong> central<br />

role <strong>of</strong> children in sustainable development. At annual<br />

meetings <strong>of</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> CIDA and NGOs, children’s<br />

issues are addressed only in peripheral ways.<br />

This concern has been echoed in an independent<br />

consultant’s report recently commissioned by CIDA.<br />

...children [should] be brought into <strong>the</strong> centre<br />

<strong>of</strong> development planning, implementation,<br />

monitoring and evaluation. <strong>Children</strong> have <strong>the</strong><br />

right to participate in development; in fact <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are already participating in many unrecognized<br />

ways. Without children’s needs, interests and<br />

rights being taken into consideration in<br />

development thinking and practices and without<br />

children’s involvement in <strong>the</strong> development<br />

process, sustainable development is not<br />

possible. 11<br />

CIDA hopes to work with NGOs to document program<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> children’s direct participation in development<br />

planning, implementation and evaluation. 12 This could be a<br />

first step towards developing a comprehensive strategy to<br />

bring children to <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> Canada’s development<br />

programs.<br />

CIDA Programming in Support<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Children</strong><br />

As part <strong>of</strong> Canada’s commitment to implement <strong>the</strong> Plan <strong>of</strong><br />

Action resulting from <strong>the</strong> World Summit <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>,<br />

CIDA recently began publishing annual reports <strong>of</strong><br />

disbursements to programs and projects with a perceived<br />

impact on children. This is defined as:<br />

• Programming with a direct impact on children<br />

occurs when children are directly included in <strong>the</strong> target<br />

group.<br />

• Programming with an indirect impact occurs when<br />

children, though not targeted directly, receive a<br />

20<br />

significant benefit; programs in which women constitute<br />

over 50 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> target group are considered as<br />

having an indirect impact on children. 13<br />

CIDA annual reports <strong>for</strong> 1995-96 and 1996-97 indicate<br />

that direct programming <strong>for</strong> children was strongest in <strong>the</strong><br />

area <strong>of</strong> basic human needs, particularly immunization and<br />

<strong>the</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong> iodine deficiency. Programs and projects<br />

with indirect impacts on children tended to be directed<br />

towards poverty reduction, community and capacity<br />

development and support <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> role and status <strong>of</strong><br />

women. 14<br />

In 1996-97, CIDA estimates it spent $580.98 million in<br />

support <strong>of</strong> children, including program disbursements by<br />

all CIDA branches and Canada Funds <strong>for</strong> Local<br />

Initiatives. 15<br />

Branch spending <strong>for</strong> children can be summarized as<br />

follows:<br />

Bilateral (country-to-country) Aid:<br />

• $159.98 million (27.5 percent <strong>of</strong> bilateral program<br />

spending);<br />

• programs include child and maternal health,<br />

immunization, basic education, micronutrient<br />

deficiencies, institutional capacity-building in favour <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> UNCRC and special protection <strong>for</strong> children. 16<br />

Multilateral Programs:<br />

• $368.1 million (estimated as 25 percent <strong>of</strong> total<br />

branch spending, except <strong>for</strong> International Humanitarian<br />

Assistance, <strong>the</strong> Food Aid Centre and UNICEF<br />

spending, which are calculated as 100 percent);<br />

• CIDA estimates that 58 percent <strong>of</strong> Multilateral<br />

Branch spending affecting children was spent through<br />

<strong>the</strong> Food Aid Centre. 17<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> Partnership Branch: 18<br />

• $52.8 million (or 18.8 percent <strong>of</strong> total branch<br />

spending);<br />

• projects relate to child labour, street children,<br />

primary health care, water and sanitation, community<br />

development and streng<strong>the</strong>ning <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> women. 19<br />

While CIDA estimates that it spent $580.98 million on<br />

programs in support <strong>of</strong> children in 1996-97, less than half<br />

($238.4 million) was actually allocated to programs that<br />

were specifically targeted to children. The remaining<br />

$342.58 million went to programs perceived to have an<br />

indirect but significant benefit <strong>for</strong> children.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!