24.03.2013 Views

Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...

Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...

Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

within an overall process heating system can vary significantly. Exhibit 4 compares the<br />

efficiency and the melt loss <strong>of</strong> the various types <strong>of</strong> furnaces the industry employs. As the Exhibit<br />

reveals, the efficiency <strong>of</strong> melting operations can vary from 7% (gas crucible, lower end) to 76%<br />

(induction, aluminum, upper end). These widely varying thermal efficiencies combined with<br />

high energy costs imply that casters should be able to identify many opportunities to improve<br />

furnace operations and thus generate significant energy (and cost) savings.<br />

Exhibit 4: Efficiency and Melt Loss for Different Die <strong>Casting</strong> Furnaces<br />

Melting Furnace Common Use Melt Loss Thermal Efficiency<br />

Cupola Iron 3-12% 40-50%<br />

Electric Arc Steel 5-8% 35-45%<br />

Immersion Zinc N/A 63-67%<br />

Electric Reverberatory<br />

Aluminum<br />

Zinc<br />

1-2%<br />

2-3%<br />

59-76%<br />

59-76%<br />

Gas Crucible<br />

Aluminum<br />

Magnesium<br />

4-6%<br />

4-6%<br />

7-19%<br />

7-19%<br />

Gas Reverberatory<br />

Aluminum<br />

Zinc<br />

3-5%<br />

4-7%<br />

30-45%<br />

32-40%<br />

Gas Stack Melter Aluminum 1-2% 40-45%<br />

Aluminum 0.75-1.25% 59-76%<br />

Copper-Base 2-3% 50-70%<br />

Induction<br />

Magnesium 2-3% 59-76%<br />

Iron 1-2% 50-70%<br />

Steel 2-3% 50-70%<br />

Source: Schwam D., Wallace J.F. and Wannasin J. “Energy Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Aluminum Melting in Die <strong>Casting</strong> Operations”, CastExpo,<br />

St. Louis, April 2005, Presentation T-072.<br />

The ITP <strong>Best</strong><strong>Practices</strong> portfolio <strong>of</strong>fers the Process Heating Assessment and Survey Tool<br />

(PHAST), a s<strong>of</strong>tware application that can aid metal casters in identifying opportunities for saving<br />

energy in process heating equipment such as melting furnaces, heat treatment furnaces, and<br />

holding furnaces. PHAST provides plant personnel with the tools to survey furnaces and to<br />

produce a report that identifies ways to increase the energy efficiency <strong>of</strong> individual pieces <strong>of</strong><br />

equipment throughout the entire heating process. <strong>Metal</strong> casters can assess equipment<br />

performance under varying operating conditions by changing the input parameter values used by<br />

PHAST.<br />

The PHAST application <strong>of</strong>fers three major benefits to metal casters:<br />

• Focuses Improvements on Energy-Intensive Equipment – Using the metal caster’s<br />

specific heat input and furnace operating data, the application reports the quantity and<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> fuel and electricity that each piece <strong>of</strong> equipment uses annually.<br />

• Calculates Potential Energy Savings – The application assesses energy-saving<br />

opportunities by comparing the performance <strong>of</strong> individual pieces <strong>of</strong> equipment under<br />

various operating conditions with that <strong>of</strong> a wide variety <strong>of</strong> retr<strong>of</strong>it technologies.<br />

• Identifies Energy Waste – PHAST evaluates all areas in which energy is used, lost, or<br />

wasted and constructs a detailed heat balance report for melting, holding, and heat<br />

treatment furnaces.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!