Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...
Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...
Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
D. Steel Foundry-2<br />
Plant Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
Steel Foundry-2 is a large foundry that employs 100+ people. It produces large carbon and alloy<br />
steel castings for the mining, cement, and power generation industries. Their castings range in<br />
size from 500 to 100,000 pounds.<br />
The process flow <strong>of</strong> the facility is typical for a steel foundry and begins in the design phase,<br />
where the facility designs the casting using the latest in computer modeling techniques. Once the<br />
foundry has designed the casting with the proper rigging system (e.g., gates, risers, chills), the<br />
design is sent to the pattern shop where the pattern is constructed.<br />
Once the pattern is constructed, the facility proceeds to build the casting molds. The facility uses<br />
no-bake sand, specifically developed by the foundry, as their molding medium and a binder that<br />
produces no visible emissions. A computer controls the sand operation and determines the<br />
mixture and the number <strong>of</strong> patterns that need to produced. Also, the facility constructs large<br />
molds within pits to produce large castings. These large molds take approximately one week to<br />
build and command a rather large footprint within the facility. Due to the considerable time<br />
required in constructing the large molds, and the large quantity <strong>of</strong> metal poured into these pit<br />
molds, these molds are conservatively designed since any error could result in a large financial<br />
loss.<br />
The facility uses two basic electric arc furnaces (capacities are 5 and 65 tons) for melting. They<br />
worked with their power utility to determine the most cost-effective time at which to melt, which<br />
proved to be the non-peak load hours from 9:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. Operating the plant on this<br />
schedule saved $250,000 per year on the electricity bill.<br />
The facility transfers molten metal from the melting furnaces to a holding furnace and, when<br />
ready to pour on to large crane-driven ladles for pouring into the molds. After the castings have<br />
solidified in the molds, they are shaken out, cleaned, and machined. In some cases, castings also<br />
are heat treated.<br />
Onsite Assessment<br />
During the site visit, the assessment team was accompanied by a technical expert from the Steel<br />
Founders’ Association <strong>of</strong> America (SFSA), the facility’s foundry manager <strong>of</strong> technical services,<br />
an environmental engineer, and a manager <strong>of</strong> the pattern shop. During the morning, plant<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials provided an overview <strong>of</strong> the plant operations and discussed with the assessment team<br />
the extent to which <strong>Metal</strong> <strong>Casting</strong> R&D had been implemented at the facility. Plant managers<br />
also provided an overview <strong>of</strong> measures they had implemented to combat rising energy costs.<br />
This was followed by the assessment team providing an overview <strong>of</strong> the suite <strong>of</strong> free s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
tools and services <strong>of</strong>fered by ITP’s <strong>Best</strong><strong>Practices</strong> subprogram. The overview included informing<br />
plant managers as to the benefits they could attain by implementing the PHAST, AirMaster+,<br />
and MotorMaster+ tools. The assessment team also discussed with the plant personnel the<br />
savings that other steel foundries that were subjected to an IAC assessment had realized. As was<br />
52