Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...
Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...
Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
also enables foundries to understand where areas <strong>of</strong> waste exist in their operation. Steel Foundry-<br />
1 has developed a process to track its castings from the shakeout operation through to product<br />
shipping. This system was under development during the assessment and was expected to come<br />
online a few months after the site visit.<br />
The tracking system will enable the foundry to gather data on individual serialized parts so it can<br />
determine areas that need improvement. Prior to this system, the foundry’s employees tracked<br />
this manually on a very small sample size, but the data were not adequate to allow tracking the<br />
costs associated with certain defects or tracking the savings achieved by reducing a specific<br />
defect in a casting. The new automated tracking system will provide the foundry with a much<br />
clearer understanding <strong>of</strong> its costs and, therefore, will constitute a far better tool for problem<br />
identification/correction and cost reduction.<br />
The tracking system also will help measure improvements that derive from implementing new<br />
technologies. For example, all castings with “burn-in” and “burn-on” require extra processing<br />
steps for removal <strong>of</strong> contaminants. Burn-in is when the surface <strong>of</strong> the casting has sand adhering<br />
to it that cannot be removed other than by grinding. Burn-on is when large pieces <strong>of</strong> sand/metal<br />
are attached to the casting by metal ligaments, which can be removed by breaking, leaving a<br />
relatively clean cast surface. This extra processing step costs the facility considerable time and<br />
money. Some <strong>of</strong> the burn-in and burn-on can be chipped <strong>of</strong>f, while other areas must be flamewashed<br />
or ground. Steel Foundry-1 has incorporated the <strong>Metal</strong> <strong>Casting</strong> R&D work at University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Missouri-Rolla to maintain the integrity <strong>of</strong> the coatings used in the sand and thereby reducing<br />
the amount <strong>of</strong> burn-in and burn-on. The foundry had realized an improvement by incorporating<br />
this work but had not quantified the effect such improvement had on its bottom line. With the<br />
help <strong>of</strong> the new tracking system, the foundry will be able to measure its success.<br />
Process Flow Improvement<br />
Many foundries suffer from poor facility design and large work-in-process inventories. The<br />
problem especially occurs in the casting finishing areas, which include blast cleaning, riser<br />
removal, grinding, welding, and heat treatment. The problem derives in part from the laborintensive<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> the finishing process. Typically, finishing accounts for 50% <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong><br />
producing steel castings. Any decrease in this cost can improve a steel foundry’s bottom line and<br />
provide it with a competitive advantage when compared to other steel foundries.<br />
Steel Foundry-1 participated in two <strong>Metal</strong> <strong>Casting</strong> R&D projects conducted by the Iowa State<br />
University (ISU): Re-Engineering <strong>Casting</strong> Production Systems and Reduction in Energy<br />
Consumption and Variability in Steel <strong>Casting</strong>s. These two projects addressed solutions and<br />
improvements in the areas <strong>of</strong> scheduling, inspection and re-work practices, plant layout, and<br />
material handling. Because <strong>of</strong> these studies and Steel Foundry-1’s participation in them, the<br />
foundry has begun to work on redesigning the process flow in its cleaning room. It has relocated<br />
the blast at the end <strong>of</strong> its newest continuous heat treat furnace to eliminate the need for a fork lift<br />
to move castings from the continuous heat furnace to the blast, thus saving the facility fuel and<br />
labor costs.<br />
48