Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...
Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...
Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
machines, spraying die lubricant, and blowing loose flash from trim equipment. Compressed air<br />
use is higher in typical sand foundries than in die casting operations. The compressed air<br />
pressure at a foundry ranges from 95-110 pounds per square inch (psi). In most cases,<br />
temperature control is only necessary to ensure that the dew point <strong>of</strong> the compressed air is kept<br />
low enough so that condensation does not collect in the line. However, some core-making<br />
processes require air at a - 40° F dew point to prevent chemical reaction between the resin and<br />
the moisture in the sand and air. 27<br />
Improving compressed air systems <strong>of</strong>fers an opportunity for metal casters to reduce their energy<br />
consumption and lower their costs. According to the Energy Use in Selected <strong>Metal</strong>casting<br />
Facilities – 2003 study, most compressed air system installations were the result <strong>of</strong> progressive<br />
growth needs and, thus, were <strong>of</strong>ten engineered poorly, were saturated with water, and exhibited<br />
numerous leaks. Furthermore, facilities <strong>of</strong>ten misapplied air in a variety <strong>of</strong> situations and<br />
selected air driers and other compressed air components based on initial capital cost rather than<br />
functionality, leading to poor operating efficiency.<br />
AirMaster+, another free s<strong>of</strong>tware tool <strong>of</strong>fered by the ITP <strong>Best</strong><strong>Practices</strong> portfolio, can help<br />
casters identify energy-saving opportunities in compressed air systems throughout the casting<br />
operation. Using plant-specific data, the tool assesses the compressed air systems and evaluates<br />
operational costs for various equipment configurations and system pr<strong>of</strong>iles. The tool estimates<br />
savings based on potential energy efficiency improvements and calculates the estimated payback<br />
periods.<br />
AirMaster+ evaluates the energy-savings potential based on reduced air leaks, improved end-use<br />
efficiency, reduced system pressure, the use <strong>of</strong> unloading controls, adjusted cascading set points,<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> automatic sequencers, reduced run time, and the addition <strong>of</strong> a primary receiver. The<br />
tool includes a database <strong>of</strong> generic or industry-standard compressor specifications and creates an<br />
inventory specific to the individual metal caster’s air system. Based on user-provided data, the<br />
tool simulates existing and modified compressed air system operations. It can model part-load<br />
system operations for an unlimited number <strong>of</strong> rotary screw, reciprocating, and centrifugal air<br />
compressors operating simultaneously with independent control strategies and schedules. The<br />
application also develops 24-hour metered airflow or power load pr<strong>of</strong>iles for each compressor,<br />
calculates lifecycle costs based on inputs <strong>of</strong> seasonal electric energy and demand charges, and<br />
tracks maintenance history for system components.<br />
In 2002, a foundry located in California that specializes in centrifugal casting implemented the<br />
AIRMaster+ tool in assessing its compressed air systems. Two rotary screw compressors served<br />
the facility: a 100-horsepower (hp) unit and a 50-hp unit. Results from the analysis enabled the<br />
facility to replace the 100-hp and 50-hp compressor with a new 50-hp compressor and upgrade<br />
the compressor controls to increase the system’s efficiency. The foundry then used the old 50-hp<br />
unit as a back up. Implementing the recommendations allowed the foundry to reduce its<br />
compressor capacity by 50%, resulting in annual compressed air energy savings <strong>of</strong> 242,000 kWh<br />
and an annual maintenance cost savings <strong>of</strong> $24,200. The implementation required the foundry to<br />
invest $38,000; however, the plant received a $10,000 incentive payment from the California<br />
Public Utilities Commission, reducing the total cost for the investment to $28,000 and its<br />
payback period for the foundry to 14 months.<br />
11