24.03.2013 Views

Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...

Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...

Implementation of Metal Casting Best Practices - EERE - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

machines, spraying die lubricant, and blowing loose flash from trim equipment. Compressed air<br />

use is higher in typical sand foundries than in die casting operations. The compressed air<br />

pressure at a foundry ranges from 95-110 pounds per square inch (psi). In most cases,<br />

temperature control is only necessary to ensure that the dew point <strong>of</strong> the compressed air is kept<br />

low enough so that condensation does not collect in the line. However, some core-making<br />

processes require air at a - 40° F dew point to prevent chemical reaction between the resin and<br />

the moisture in the sand and air. 27<br />

Improving compressed air systems <strong>of</strong>fers an opportunity for metal casters to reduce their energy<br />

consumption and lower their costs. According to the Energy Use in Selected <strong>Metal</strong>casting<br />

Facilities – 2003 study, most compressed air system installations were the result <strong>of</strong> progressive<br />

growth needs and, thus, were <strong>of</strong>ten engineered poorly, were saturated with water, and exhibited<br />

numerous leaks. Furthermore, facilities <strong>of</strong>ten misapplied air in a variety <strong>of</strong> situations and<br />

selected air driers and other compressed air components based on initial capital cost rather than<br />

functionality, leading to poor operating efficiency.<br />

AirMaster+, another free s<strong>of</strong>tware tool <strong>of</strong>fered by the ITP <strong>Best</strong><strong>Practices</strong> portfolio, can help<br />

casters identify energy-saving opportunities in compressed air systems throughout the casting<br />

operation. Using plant-specific data, the tool assesses the compressed air systems and evaluates<br />

operational costs for various equipment configurations and system pr<strong>of</strong>iles. The tool estimates<br />

savings based on potential energy efficiency improvements and calculates the estimated payback<br />

periods.<br />

AirMaster+ evaluates the energy-savings potential based on reduced air leaks, improved end-use<br />

efficiency, reduced system pressure, the use <strong>of</strong> unloading controls, adjusted cascading set points,<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> automatic sequencers, reduced run time, and the addition <strong>of</strong> a primary receiver. The<br />

tool includes a database <strong>of</strong> generic or industry-standard compressor specifications and creates an<br />

inventory specific to the individual metal caster’s air system. Based on user-provided data, the<br />

tool simulates existing and modified compressed air system operations. It can model part-load<br />

system operations for an unlimited number <strong>of</strong> rotary screw, reciprocating, and centrifugal air<br />

compressors operating simultaneously with independent control strategies and schedules. The<br />

application also develops 24-hour metered airflow or power load pr<strong>of</strong>iles for each compressor,<br />

calculates lifecycle costs based on inputs <strong>of</strong> seasonal electric energy and demand charges, and<br />

tracks maintenance history for system components.<br />

In 2002, a foundry located in California that specializes in centrifugal casting implemented the<br />

AIRMaster+ tool in assessing its compressed air systems. Two rotary screw compressors served<br />

the facility: a 100-horsepower (hp) unit and a 50-hp unit. Results from the analysis enabled the<br />

facility to replace the 100-hp and 50-hp compressor with a new 50-hp compressor and upgrade<br />

the compressor controls to increase the system’s efficiency. The foundry then used the old 50-hp<br />

unit as a back up. Implementing the recommendations allowed the foundry to reduce its<br />

compressor capacity by 50%, resulting in annual compressed air energy savings <strong>of</strong> 242,000 kWh<br />

and an annual maintenance cost savings <strong>of</strong> $24,200. The implementation required the foundry to<br />

invest $38,000; however, the plant received a $10,000 incentive payment from the California<br />

Public Utilities Commission, reducing the total cost for the investment to $28,000 and its<br />

payback period for the foundry to 14 months.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!