25.03.2013 Views

River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...

River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...

River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>River</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>stream</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>ecology</strong> in the <strong>Wellington</strong> region: State <strong>and</strong> trends<br />

(e) E. coli<br />

Thirteen RSoE sites exhibited meaningful trends in raw <strong>and</strong>/or flow-adjusted<br />

E. coli counts over the reporting period (Table 4.13). Increasing trends were<br />

observed in the raw data from seven sites, with sites on the Kopuaranga<br />

<strong>and</strong> Whangaehu rivers recording the largest rates of change (43 <strong>and</strong> 85<br />

cfu/100 mL/year, respectively). However, the flow-adjusted analysis (which<br />

was limited to six of the seven sites) demonstrated that only two of these sites<br />

recorded a corresponding increasing trend in E. coli counts (ie, the increasing<br />

counts at most sites, although indicative of a deterioration in <strong>water</strong> <strong>quality</strong>, can<br />

be attributed to river flow conditions). Further, the two sites that did also<br />

display increasing trends in flow-adjusted E. coli counts (Totara Stream at<br />

Stronvar <strong>and</strong> Waiohine <strong>River</strong> at Gorge) had very low median values (5 cfu/100mL),<br />

indicating that the increasing trends are of little environmental consequence. In<br />

contrast, the magnitude of change was more notable for the two sites that<br />

exhibited decreasing trends in both raw <strong>and</strong> flow-adjusted E. coli counts<br />

(Akatarawa <strong>River</strong> at Hutt confluence <strong>and</strong> Waipoua <strong>River</strong> at Colombo Road); E.<br />

coli counts at these sites decreased in the order of 10 cfu/100mL/year between<br />

July 2005 <strong>and</strong> June 2011 (Table 4.13). The reason for the improvements is<br />

unclear; the median values were relatively low for the reporting period <strong>and</strong><br />

meet the ANZECC (2000) stock <strong>water</strong> TV.<br />

Table 4.13: Summary of meaningful trends (ie, p1%<br />

per year) in E. coli counts (cfu/100mL) recorded at RSoE sites over July 2006 to<br />

June 2011. Bolded median values exceed the relevant ANZECC (2000) lowl<strong>and</strong><br />

TV (refer Table 4.1). MASS=median annual Sen slope (cfu/100mL/yr) calculated<br />

using the Seasonal Kendall test. The arrow indicates the direction of the trend<br />

Site Site name Median n MASS<br />

Raw data Flow-adjusted data<br />

Rate of<br />

change<br />

(%/year)<br />

Trend n MASS<br />

Rate of<br />

change<br />

(%/year)<br />

RS03 Waitohu S at Forest Park 6 No trend 57 -2.30 -38.3 ↓<br />

RS09 Waikanae R at Mangaone Wk 13 No trend 60 -2.31 -18.5 ↓<br />

RS14 Pauatahanui S at Elmwood Br 255 60 28.30 11.1 ↑ No trend<br />

RS22 Hutt R at Boulcott 105 60 -14.47 -13.8 ↓ No trend<br />

RS23 Pakuratahi R 50m d/s Farm Ck 66 60 14.84 22.3 ↑ No trend<br />

RS25 Akatarawa R at Hutt R confl. 56 60 -10.84 -19.4 ↓ 60 -10.54 -18.8 ↓<br />

RS29 Wainuiomata R u/s of White Br 100 No trend 59 -26.14 -26.1 ↓<br />

RS34 Ruamahanga R at Pukio 105 60 25.22 24.0 ↑ No trend<br />

RS38 Kopuaranga R at Stewarts 210 60 43.32 20.6 ↑ No trend<br />

RS39 Whangaehu R 250 u/s confl. 285 60 84.71 29.7 ↑ Not assessed (no flow data)<br />

RS40 Waipoua R at Colombo Rd Br 73 60 -11.49 -15.8 ↓ 52 -10.56 -19.2 ↓<br />

RS44 Totara S at Stronvar 5 57 1.44 28.8 ↑ 57 2.76 55.2 ↑<br />

RS47 Waiohine R at Gorge 5 60 0.99 22.0 ↑ 60 1.19 26.5 ↑<br />

WGN_DOCS-#1100598-V3 PAGE 53 OF 160<br />

Trend<br />

(f) National <strong>River</strong> Water Quality Network (NRWQN) sites<br />

Just three meaningful trends were observed across the five NRWQN sites for<br />

the six <strong>water</strong> <strong>quality</strong> variables examined (Table 4.14). Only the increase in<br />

DRP concentration of 0.0002 mg/L/year at Hutt <strong>River</strong> at Kaitoke (a reference<br />

site) was evident in both raw <strong>and</strong> flow-adjusted data sets. No such equivalent<br />

trend was observed at <strong>Greater</strong> <strong>Wellington</strong>’s site further down<strong>stream</strong> at Te

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!