25.03.2013 Views

River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...

River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...

River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>River</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>stream</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>ecology</strong> in the <strong>Wellington</strong> region: State <strong>and</strong> trends<br />

It should also be noted that MCI <strong>and</strong> QMCI thresholds suggested by Stark <strong>and</strong><br />

Maxted (2007) do not take into account the natural variation in<br />

macroinvertebrate community composition that can occur in response to<br />

differences in catchment altitude, geology <strong>and</strong> other geophysical characteristics.<br />

6.1.2 Macroinvertebrate metrics<br />

Summary statistics for the four metrics calculated (MCI, QMCI, %EPT taxa <strong>and</strong><br />

%EPT individuals) calculated for each of the 55 RSoE sites are presented in<br />

Table 6.2. Mean MCI scores across the 55 RSoE sites ranged from a minimum<br />

of 67 (Waiwhetu Stream at Wainuiomata Hill Bridge) to a maximum of 146<br />

(Ruamahanga <strong>River</strong> at McLays). As outlined in Section 2.3, the Waiwhetu<br />

Stream site is known to be occasionally influenced by tidal backflow <strong>and</strong> taxa<br />

indicative of estuarine conditions have been recorded at this site. Because the<br />

MCI was not designed to take into account estuarine influence its application at<br />

this site may not be appropriate. The next lowest mean MCI score recorded<br />

across the 55 sites was 75.9 (Parkvale Stream at Weir).<br />

Based on mean MCI scores, 16 sites were classified as ‘excellent’, 20 sites as<br />

‘good’, 16 sites as ‘fair’ <strong>and</strong> 3 sites as ‘poor’. All sites classed as ‘excellent’<br />

drain up<strong>stream</strong> catchments dominated by indigenous forest. The seven sites<br />

classed as ‘poor’ or within the ‘fuzzy boundary’ of the fair/poor threshold were<br />

found in catchments dominated by pastoral or urban l<strong>and</strong>cover (Figure 6.1). All<br />

but one of these sites have substrate dominated by soft sediment – the<br />

exception being Parkvale Stream at Weir which has a relatively small<br />

catchment dominated by intensive agricultural l<strong>and</strong> use.<br />

Number of sites<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Indigenous forest Pasture Urban Exotic forest<br />

Excellent<br />

Good<br />

Fair<br />

Poor<br />

Figure 6.1: Macroinvertebrate <strong>quality</strong> classes assigned to each of the 55 RSoE<br />

sites, grouped according to REC l<strong>and</strong>cover. Quality classes are based on the<br />

application of Stark <strong>and</strong> Maxted (2007) thresholds to mean MCI scores from<br />

annual sampling in 2009, 2010 <strong>and</strong> 2011. Hatched boxes represent sites within<br />

the ±5 MCI unit ‘fuzzy boundary’ between each class (note the result from the<br />

single exotic forestry site falls on the boundary of the fair/good threshold)<br />

WGN_DOCS-#1100598-V3 PAGE 77 OF 160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!