River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>River</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>stream</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>ecology</strong> in the <strong>Wellington</strong> region: State <strong>and</strong> trends<br />
Annual mean <strong>and</strong> maximum<br />
mat periphyton <strong>stream</strong>bed cover (%)<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
RS21 annual maximum<br />
RS21 annual mean<br />
RS22 annual maximum<br />
RS22 annual mean<br />
0<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
Figure 5.7: Annual mean <strong>and</strong> maximum mat periphyton <strong>stream</strong>bed cover at Hutt<br />
<strong>River</strong> opposite Manor Park Golf Club (RS21) <strong>and</strong> Hutt <strong>River</strong> at Boulcott (RS22),<br />
based on monthly assessments undertaken over 2003/04 to 2010/11 (based on a<br />
July to June year). The horizontal red line indicates the MfE (2000) <strong>stream</strong>bed cover<br />
guidelines for mat periphyton (60%)<br />
Clear trends were evident in periphyton biomass at four sites (Table 5.7): a<br />
decreasing trend at Waitohu Stream at Forest Park <strong>and</strong> increasing trends at<br />
Mangaroa <strong>River</strong> at Te Marua, Wainuiomata <strong>River</strong> up<strong>stream</strong> of White Bridge<br />
<strong>and</strong> Ruamahanga <strong>River</strong> at Gladstone (Figure 5.8). The three increasing trends<br />
ranged in magnitude from 9 to 18 mg/m 2 /yr, representing an increase of more<br />
than 20% per year relative to the mean periphyton biomass values.<br />
Exceedance of the MfE (2000) guideline for protection of aquatic biodiversity<br />
at all three sites <strong>and</strong> a corresponding decreasing trend in macroinvertebrate<br />
health at one site (Ruamahanga <strong>River</strong> at Gladstone, see Section 6.2.2) suggests<br />
that these increases in periphyton biomass may be ecologically significant. In<br />
contrast, the small magnitude of the decreasing trend at Waitohu Stream at<br />
Forest Park, a site with already low periphyton biomass, is unlikely to be<br />
ecologically significant.<br />
Table 5.7: Summary of ‘probable’ (p