25.03.2013 Views

River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...

River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...

River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>River</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>stream</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>ecology</strong> in the <strong>Wellington</strong> region: State <strong>and</strong> trends<br />

Annual mean <strong>and</strong> maximum<br />

mat periphyton <strong>stream</strong>bed cover (%)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

RS21 annual maximum<br />

RS21 annual mean<br />

RS22 annual maximum<br />

RS22 annual mean<br />

0<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Figure 5.7: Annual mean <strong>and</strong> maximum mat periphyton <strong>stream</strong>bed cover at Hutt<br />

<strong>River</strong> opposite Manor Park Golf Club (RS21) <strong>and</strong> Hutt <strong>River</strong> at Boulcott (RS22),<br />

based on monthly assessments undertaken over 2003/04 to 2010/11 (based on a<br />

July to June year). The horizontal red line indicates the MfE (2000) <strong>stream</strong>bed cover<br />

guidelines for mat periphyton (60%)<br />

Clear trends were evident in periphyton biomass at four sites (Table 5.7): a<br />

decreasing trend at Waitohu Stream at Forest Park <strong>and</strong> increasing trends at<br />

Mangaroa <strong>River</strong> at Te Marua, Wainuiomata <strong>River</strong> up<strong>stream</strong> of White Bridge<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ruamahanga <strong>River</strong> at Gladstone (Figure 5.8). The three increasing trends<br />

ranged in magnitude from 9 to 18 mg/m 2 /yr, representing an increase of more<br />

than 20% per year relative to the mean periphyton biomass values.<br />

Exceedance of the MfE (2000) guideline for protection of aquatic biodiversity<br />

at all three sites <strong>and</strong> a corresponding decreasing trend in macroinvertebrate<br />

health at one site (Ruamahanga <strong>River</strong> at Gladstone, see Section 6.2.2) suggests<br />

that these increases in periphyton biomass may be ecologically significant. In<br />

contrast, the small magnitude of the decreasing trend at Waitohu Stream at<br />

Forest Park, a site with already low periphyton biomass, is unlikely to be<br />

ecologically significant.<br />

Table 5.7: Summary of ‘probable’ (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!