River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>River</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>stream</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>ecology</strong> in the <strong>Wellington</strong> region: State <strong>and</strong> trends<br />
The MCI developed for hard-bottomed <strong>stream</strong>s was applied to all 55 RSoE<br />
sites, including the nine sites with predominantly soft sedimentary substrate<br />
(see Appendix 1). While this approach differs from some earlier reports<br />
(eg, Perrie 2007; Perrie & Cockeram 2010) that used the MCI developed for<br />
soft-bottomed <strong>stream</strong>s (MCIsb) to summarise data collected from these sites, it<br />
provides for easier inter-site comparisons <strong>and</strong> avoids some of the uncertainties<br />
<strong>and</strong> limitations associated with the use of the MCIsb. For example:<br />
Stark <strong>and</strong> Maxted (2007) note that MCIsb is most appropriate for use at<br />
sites that are known to be naturally soft-sedimentary rather than hardbottomed<br />
sites that have been inundated with sediment. While the natural<br />
substrate characteristics of the nine RSoE sites that have predominantly<br />
soft sedimentary substrate are unknown, at least some of these sites are<br />
likely to have been hard sedimentary in their natural state.<br />
A number of taxa recorded at soft-bottomed RSoE sites have yet to be<br />
assigned MCIsb tolerance scores, meaning that the index can only be<br />
calculated from a subset of the total taxa present.<br />
Relationships between macroinvertebrate metrics, l<strong>and</strong>cover <strong>and</strong> selected<br />
environmental variables were assessed using Spearman rank correlations with a<br />
significance threshold of p