River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>River</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>stream</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>ecology</strong> in the <strong>Wellington</strong> region: State <strong>and</strong> trends<br />
Eight sites exceeded the MfE (2000) filamentous periphyton <strong>stream</strong>bed cover<br />
guideline (30% cover) on at least a quarter or more of sampling occasions<br />
during the reporting period (Table 5.3). Four of these sites are located on small<br />
<strong>stream</strong>s draining predominantly urban catchments (Porirua Stream at Glenside,<br />
Porirua Stream at Wall Park, Karori Stream at Makara Peak <strong>and</strong><br />
Kaiwharawhara Stream at Ngaio Gorge) <strong>and</strong> the other four sites are located in<br />
predominantly pastoral catchments that drain the eastern Wairarapa hill<br />
country (Taueru <strong>River</strong> at Gladstone, Kopuaranga <strong>River</strong> at Stewarts, Huangarua<br />
<strong>River</strong> at Ponatahi Bridge <strong>and</strong> Awhea <strong>River</strong> at Tora Road).<br />
The sites that most regularly exceeded the MfE (2000) mat periphyton<br />
<strong>stream</strong>bed cover guideline were Waipoua <strong>River</strong> at Colombo Road <strong>and</strong><br />
Huangarua <strong>River</strong> at Ponatahi Bridge (14% <strong>and</strong> 11% of sampling occasions,<br />
respectively). Hutt <strong>River</strong> opposite Manor Park, Hutt <strong>River</strong> at Boulcott <strong>and</strong><br />
Mangaroa <strong>River</strong> at Te Marua also recorded elevated mat periphyton cover on<br />
some occasions (Table 5.3).<br />
5.1.3 Periphyton biomass<br />
Twenty two of the 46 RSoE sites exceeded the MfE (2000) chlorophyll a<br />
guideline for benthic biodiversity (50 mg/m 2 ) on at least one of the annual<br />
sampling occasions over the three-year reporting period (Table 5.3). Four sites<br />
exceeded the guideline twice <strong>and</strong> three sites exceeded in all three years: Taueru<br />
<strong>River</strong> at Gladstone, Kopuaranga <strong>River</strong> at Stewarts <strong>and</strong> Huangarua <strong>River</strong> at<br />
Ponatahi Bridge (Table 5.3).<br />
Two sites exceeded the MfE (2000) chlorophyll a guideline of 120 mg/m 2 for<br />
the protection of trout habitat <strong>and</strong> fisheries on one sampling occasion<br />
(Wainuiomata <strong>River</strong> up<strong>stream</strong> of White Bridge <strong>and</strong> Mangatarere Stream at SH 2).<br />
Two sites (Parkvale Stream at Weir <strong>and</strong> Huangarua <strong>River</strong> at Ponatahi Bridge)<br />
exceeded the threshold twice <strong>and</strong> two sites exceeded on all three sampling<br />
occasions (Taueru <strong>River</strong> at Gladstone <strong>and</strong> Kopuaranga <strong>River</strong> at Stewarts).<br />
5.1.4 Periphyton classes <strong>and</strong> relationship with l<strong>and</strong>cover<br />
Overall, 19 RSoE sites were assigned a periphyton classification of ‘excellent’,<br />
indicative of a very high level of compliance with the MfE (2000) periphyton<br />
cover <strong>and</strong> biomass guidelines. Eight sites were classified as ‘good’ (17%),<br />
eight were ‘fair’ (17%) <strong>and</strong> 11 were ‘poor’ (24%). The majority (17) of sites<br />
classed as ‘excellent’ are located in catchments dominated by indigenous forest<br />
(Figure 5.1), with the remaining two sites (Makara Stream at Kennels <strong>and</strong><br />
Parkvale Stream at Lowes Reserve) located in pasture dominated catchments.<br />
Sites classed as ‘poor’ have up<strong>stream</strong> catchments dominated by either pasture<br />
or urban l<strong>and</strong>cover.<br />
There was a strong negative correlation (rs=-0.73, p