River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
River and stream water quality and ecology - Greater Wellington ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>River</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>stream</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>ecology</strong> in the <strong>Wellington</strong> region: State <strong>and</strong> trends<br />
(a) RSoE sites<br />
Over 2009 to 2011, four RSoE sites (Beef Creek at Head<strong>water</strong>s,<br />
Kaiwharawhara Stream at Ngaio Gorge, Tauanui <strong>River</strong> at Whakatomotomo<br />
Road <strong>and</strong> Totara Stream at Stronvar) were surveyed following st<strong>and</strong>ardised<br />
fish monitoring protocols documented in David et al. (2010); in brief, this<br />
involved fishing 150 m of suitable <strong>stream</strong> reach using one-pass backpack<br />
electric fishing. Additionally, a 150 m reach of the Whareroa Stream at Queen<br />
Elizabeth Park was also surveyed in 2011 using 10 fyke nets <strong>and</strong> 20 minnow<br />
traps 26 . The use of nets <strong>and</strong> traps at this site follows ‘best practice’<br />
recommendations for surveying fresh<strong>water</strong> fish communities in deep <strong>stream</strong>s<br />
(typically >0.6 m) characterised by a soft-bottomed substrate, poor <strong>water</strong><br />
clarity <strong>and</strong> low velocities (Joy & David in prep.).<br />
(b) NZFFD records<br />
Given the limited RSoE fish data available, the current state of fresh<strong>water</strong> fish<br />
communities in the <strong>Wellington</strong> region was assessed using NZFFD records for<br />
the period 1990 to 2010. This 20-year period was chosen to provide sufficient<br />
data for analysis. However, it must be recognised that, in some cases, NZFFD<br />
records from the earlier part of this period may no longer accurately represent<br />
the current state of the fish communities in the river or <strong>stream</strong> surveyed.<br />
All fish survey records for the <strong>Wellington</strong> region were downloaded from the<br />
NZFFD in April 2011. The ‘sampling locality’ for each record was screened<br />
prior to any analyses being undertaken <strong>and</strong> all records with sampling localities<br />
that were clearly not river or <strong>stream</strong> type environments (eg, lakes, wetl<strong>and</strong>s,<br />
etc.) were excluded from the dataset. NZFFD records were plotted on a map to<br />
provide a spatial representation of fish surveys across the region. A list of<br />
species, both indigenous <strong>and</strong> introduced, was compiled <strong>and</strong> the ‘frequency of<br />
occurrence’ of each species in the region was calculated (ie, the number of<br />
records for a species divided by the total number of records in the NZFFD).<br />
IBI scores were calculated for all records <strong>and</strong> the range of scores compared<br />
between different catchments. Comparisons between catchments were limited<br />
to those that had sufficient records (in this case arbitrarily defined as n ≥ 15).<br />
Given the large variation in the number of records between catchments, along<br />
with the significant range of catchment sizes assessed, no in-depth analysis was<br />
undertaken other than summarising the range of IBI scores for each catchment.<br />
Relationships between IBI scores <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>cover were examined following a<br />
similar approach to Joy (2011). Each NZFFD record was assigned a <strong>River</strong><br />
Environment Classification (REC) l<strong>and</strong>cover class (see Appendix 2) of<br />
indigenous forest, exotic forest, pasture or urban. Because the data were not<br />
normally distributed, differences between IBI scores for different l<strong>and</strong>cover<br />
types were examined using a Kruskal-Wallis One Way Analysis of Variance<br />
on ranked data. These tests were performed in SigmaPlot (Version 11.0) with<br />
a statistically significant difference set at p