Is it necessary to install a downhole safety valve in a subsea ... - NTNU
Is it necessary to install a downhole safety valve in a subsea ... - NTNU
Is it necessary to install a downhole safety valve in a subsea ... - NTNU
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Appendix D<br />
Reliabil<strong>it</strong>y data dossier<br />
This appendix presents the data dossiers, which form a basis for the <strong>in</strong>put <strong>to</strong> the reliabil<strong>it</strong>y<br />
calculations. Reliabil<strong>it</strong>y data dossiers are databases where the <strong>in</strong>formation used <strong>in</strong> the<br />
calculations are gathered <strong>to</strong> provide an easy access <strong>to</strong> the sources. Failure rates are found from<br />
for each component <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the barrier system. The data collected are traceable and<br />
testable for future work based on this thesis. To provide an overview over the leakage<br />
s<strong>it</strong>uations of each component the dossiers of this report has <strong>in</strong>cluded the leakage paths<br />
concern<strong>in</strong>g the ‘TOP’-event, leakage <strong>to</strong> the surround<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Note that the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and test <strong>in</strong>tervals are specific for this report (see subsection 5.4.2<br />
for details).<br />
The schemes are based on data from exist<strong>in</strong>g databases. The qual<strong>it</strong>y and quant<strong>it</strong>y of the<br />
provided data vary a lot. Many of the different components have got l<strong>it</strong>tle or no documented<br />
data available. For a wider quant<strong>it</strong>ative study <strong>it</strong> is suggested that failure rates from several<br />
more sources are supplied and even for the specific area the wells w<strong>it</strong>hout a DHSV are <strong>to</strong> be<br />
implemented. A weigh<strong>in</strong>g of the different sources accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> their relevance for each<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual component is also suggested.<br />
Component: Tub<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Failure rate<br />
(10 -6 /hours)<br />
Reliabil<strong>it</strong>y data dossier<br />
Failure mode<br />
Data source/comment<br />
0.41 Leakage, TAC Reliabil<strong>it</strong>y of well completion<br />
equipment - Phase II p.18.<br />
Operational time 13364.03 years,<br />
failures 48.*<br />
Recommended values for calculations:<br />
Failure rate (10 -6 /hrs):<br />
TAC: 0.4<br />
Test<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance:<br />
The tub<strong>in</strong>g is never tested. Repairs on the tub<strong>in</strong>g would require a well workover.<br />
Comments and leakage paths:<br />
The tub<strong>in</strong>g leakage is trough the tub<strong>in</strong>g material or <strong>in</strong> the tub<strong>in</strong>g connections out <strong>to</strong> annulus.<br />
The leakage would normally occur <strong>in</strong> the connections.<br />
* The value does not <strong>in</strong>clude <strong><strong>in</strong>stall</strong>ation failures (i.e. failure occurr<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the first six days<br />
after <strong><strong>in</strong>stall</strong>ation).<br />
D-1