26.03.2013 Views

Is it necessary to install a downhole safety valve in a subsea ... - NTNU

Is it necessary to install a downhole safety valve in a subsea ... - NTNU

Is it necessary to install a downhole safety valve in a subsea ... - NTNU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix D<br />

Reliabil<strong>it</strong>y data dossier<br />

This appendix presents the data dossiers, which form a basis for the <strong>in</strong>put <strong>to</strong> the reliabil<strong>it</strong>y<br />

calculations. Reliabil<strong>it</strong>y data dossiers are databases where the <strong>in</strong>formation used <strong>in</strong> the<br />

calculations are gathered <strong>to</strong> provide an easy access <strong>to</strong> the sources. Failure rates are found from<br />

for each component <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the barrier system. The data collected are traceable and<br />

testable for future work based on this thesis. To provide an overview over the leakage<br />

s<strong>it</strong>uations of each component the dossiers of this report has <strong>in</strong>cluded the leakage paths<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g the ‘TOP’-event, leakage <strong>to</strong> the surround<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Note that the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and test <strong>in</strong>tervals are specific for this report (see subsection 5.4.2<br />

for details).<br />

The schemes are based on data from exist<strong>in</strong>g databases. The qual<strong>it</strong>y and quant<strong>it</strong>y of the<br />

provided data vary a lot. Many of the different components have got l<strong>it</strong>tle or no documented<br />

data available. For a wider quant<strong>it</strong>ative study <strong>it</strong> is suggested that failure rates from several<br />

more sources are supplied and even for the specific area the wells w<strong>it</strong>hout a DHSV are <strong>to</strong> be<br />

implemented. A weigh<strong>in</strong>g of the different sources accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> their relevance for each<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual component is also suggested.<br />

Component: Tub<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Failure rate<br />

(10 -6 /hours)<br />

Reliabil<strong>it</strong>y data dossier<br />

Failure mode<br />

Data source/comment<br />

0.41 Leakage, TAC Reliabil<strong>it</strong>y of well completion<br />

equipment - Phase II p.18.<br />

Operational time 13364.03 years,<br />

failures 48.*<br />

Recommended values for calculations:<br />

Failure rate (10 -6 /hrs):<br />

TAC: 0.4<br />

Test<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance:<br />

The tub<strong>in</strong>g is never tested. Repairs on the tub<strong>in</strong>g would require a well workover.<br />

Comments and leakage paths:<br />

The tub<strong>in</strong>g leakage is trough the tub<strong>in</strong>g material or <strong>in</strong> the tub<strong>in</strong>g connections out <strong>to</strong> annulus.<br />

The leakage would normally occur <strong>in</strong> the connections.<br />

* The value does not <strong>in</strong>clude <strong><strong>in</strong>stall</strong>ation failures (i.e. failure occurr<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the first six days<br />

after <strong><strong>in</strong>stall</strong>ation).<br />

D-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!