Onsite Use of Recycled Asphalt Pavement Materials and Geocells to ...

Figure 4.29 Profiles of the HMA surface before and after the test for the 15 cm thick
geocell-reinforced RAP base section 71
Figure 4.30 The permanent deformation versus the number of loading cycles
for the 15 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 72
Figure 4.31 The elastic deformation versus the number of loading cycles for the 15 cm
thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 73
Figure 4.32 The measured strain on the geocell wall in different locations for the 15 cm
thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 74
Figure 4.33 The strain at the bottom of the HMA surface versus the number of loading
cycles for the 15 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 75
Figure 4.34 The vertical stress at the interface between subgrade and base versus the
number of loading cycles for the 15 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP
base section 76
Figure 4.35 The stress distribution angle versus the number of loading cycle
for 15 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 76
Figure 4.36 The CBR profile obtained from the DCP tests for the 23 cm thick
geocell-reinforced RAP base section before the plate load test 77
Figure 4.37 The calculated dynamic deformation modulus versus the size of loading
plate for the 23 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 78
Figure 4.38 Profiles of the HMA surface before and after the test for the 23 cm thick
geocell-reinforced RAP base section 89
Figure 4.39 The permanent deformation versus the number of loading cycles
for the 23 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 80
Figure 4.40 The elastic deformation versus the number of loading cycle for the 23 cm
thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 80
Figure 4.41 The measured strain on the geocell wall in different locations for the 23 cm
thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 81
Figure 4.42 The strain at the bottom of the HMA surface versus number of loading
cycles for the 23 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 82
Figure 4.43 The vertical stress at the interface between subgrade and base versus the
number of loading cycles for the 23 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP
base section 83
Figure 4.44 The stress distribution angle versus number of loading cycles for 23 cm thick
geocell-reinforced RAP base section 83
Figure 4.45 The CBR profiles obtained from the DCP tests for the 30 cm thick
unreinforced RAP base section 84
Figure 4.46 The calculated dynamic deformation modulus versus the size of loading
plate for the 30 cm thick unreinforced RAP base section 85
Figure 4.47 Profiles of the HMA surface before and after the test for the 30 cm thick
unreinforced RAP base section 86
vii