Onsite Use of Recycled Asphalt Pavement Materials and Geocells to ...

Figure 4.48 The permanent deformation versus the number of loading cycles
for the 30 cm thick unreinforced RAP base section 87
Figure 4.49 The elastic deformation versus the number of loading cycles for the 30 cm
thick unreinforced RAP base section 88
Figure 4.50 The strain at the bottom of the HMA surface versus number of
loading cycles for the 30 cm thick unreinforced RAP base section 89
Figure 4.51 The vertical stress at the interface between subgrade and base versus the
number of loading cycles for the 30 cm thick unreinforced RAP
base section 90
Figure 4.52 The stress distribution angle versus the number of loading cycles
for 30 cm thick unreinforced RAP base section 90
Figure 4.53 The CBR profiles obtained from the DCP tests for the 30 cm thick
geocell-reinforced RAP base section before the plate load test 91
Figure 4.54 The calculated dynamic deformation modulus versus the size of loading
plate for the 30 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 92
Figure 4.55 Profiles of the HMA surface before and after the test for the 30 cm thick
geocell-reinforced RAP base section 93
Figure 4.56 The permanent deformation versus the number of loading cycles
for the 30 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 94
Figure 4.57 The elastic deformation versus the number of loading cycles for the 30 cm
thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 94
Figure 4.58 The measured strain on the geocell wall in different locations for the 30 cm
thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section (top geocell) 95
Figure 4.59 The measured strain on the geocell wall in different locations for the 30 cm
thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section (bottom geocell) 96
Figure 4.60 The strain at the bottom of the HMA surface versus number of loading
cycles for the 30 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 97
Figure 4.61 The vertical stress at the interface between subgrade and base versus the
number of loading cycles for the 30 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP
base section 98
Figure 4.62 The stress distribution angle versus the number of loading cycles for
30 cm thick geocell-reinforced RAP base section 98
Figure 4.63 The average CBR profiles obtained from the DCP tests 100
Figure 4.64 The surface permanent deformation at the center versus the number
of loading cycles 104
Figure 4.65 Distributions of surface permanent deformations at the 25 mm
deformation at the center 105
Figure 4.66 The percentage of elastic deformations versus the number
of loading cycles 106
viii