03.04.2013 Views

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

xxviii General Introduction<br />

it is represented by the gods or the vaguer personifications of supernatural<br />

powers. Elsewhere, it may be the Christian God or Fate or Destiny.<br />

Call it any name one will, tragedy always presents man as living under<br />

something divine or superhuman which partially determines his actions.<br />

It may be argued then that these are the three basic assumptions of<br />

tragedy: first, the dignity of man, second, the freedom of his will and<br />

his responsibility for the use which he makes of that will, and third, the<br />

existence in the universe of a superhuman factor. It may be further<br />

suggested that, having made these assumptions, tragedy is fundamentally<br />

oriented towards the problem of evil, either explicitly or implicitly. It<br />

faces squarely the fact of evil in the world, that there is misery in man's<br />

life, which is a life to be ended by the mystery of death. Sometimes<br />

tragedy grapples directly with the problem as is the case in Aeschylus'<br />

Prometheus Bound and Oresteia. Perhaps it is because of their direct<br />

attack upon the essence of evil that these plays achieve a scale and universality<br />

never reached in Shakespeare. Sometimes the orientation is<br />

more implicit, as it is in Euripides' Hippolytus, for example, or in Hamlet,<br />

or Othello, or Oedipus the King, or The Bacchae. The action of all these<br />

plays illustrates the working of one aspect of evil or another, and provides<br />

in a sense material out of which one can construct some terms<br />

upon which the fact of evil can be faced. Therefore, rather than maintain<br />

with Aristotle and Bradley that tragedy occurs only in connection with<br />

a tragic hero and his "tragic flaw," it seems better to insist upon a wider<br />

scope, a genus which will include the Aristotelian type as one of its<br />

most important species, namely, that tragedy makes the three assumptions<br />

with respect to man's life, and then places him over against the<br />

everlasting and eternally mysterious question of evil. Then and only<br />

then does tragedy arise, but it is important to note that this does not<br />

mean utter defeat for man, since the first assumption is that man's life<br />

is meaningful. That there is not utter defeat in true tragedy seems to<br />

be at the very core of Horatio's last lines of farewell to Hamlet:<br />

Now cracks a noble heart. Good night, sweet prince,<br />

And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest.<br />

And may it not be that there are those who seek to interpret life, make<br />

the three assumptions of the tragic, face the problem of evil, and call<br />

life a tragedy, but never defeat?<br />

Of the many writers of Greek tragedy only Aeschylus, Sophocles, and<br />

Euripides are represented in the collection of plays which have survived,<br />

and even this collection includes but a small fraction of .the total number<br />

of dramas which these men wrote. Aeschylus, the earliest of the three,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!