03.04.2013 Views

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

General Introduction xxxix<br />

tween the parodos as a whole and the syzygies which it contains is the<br />

same as that which exists between the latter half of the comedy and its<br />

episodic syzygies. In both cases we seem to be dealing with an extension<br />

to a new use of a formal structure not originally indigenous to these parts<br />

of the play, whereas the syzygy looks like an essential and primordial<br />

feature of the parabasis.<br />

The same may be said of the agon, the last of the formal peculiarities<br />

of fifth-century comedy which we have to examine. 6 Generally to be<br />

described as a highly conventional debate, the agon is functionally not<br />

nearly so undramatic and formally not quite so strict as the parabasis,<br />

but it is structurally even more elaborate. For obvious reasons it is<br />

usually found in the first half of the typical fifth-century comedy. The<br />

establishment of the new and incongruous situation inevitably encounters<br />

determined opposition from some defender of the old order, and the<br />

resultant conflict usually begins with deeds and ends with words. As<br />

soon as both of the combatants have agreed to settle their differences<br />

in orderly debate, the agon is opened with the singing of the ode by the<br />

Chorus. This usually contains some comment on the issues involved in<br />

the debate; occasionally we find it interrupted by spoken lines from<br />

one or both of the combatants. After the ode the Leader of the Chorus<br />

instructs one of the opposing parties to present his case; this command<br />

always fills exactly two lines and is called the katakeleusmos. The designated<br />

party, who always turns out to be the loser of the debate, then<br />

expounds his views in the epirrheme, which is never a single speech, but<br />

is interrupted, frequently or infrequently, by the defender of the other<br />

side. The pleader normally grows more and more fervid and excited,<br />

finally winding up with a pnigos. The four parts are then repeated. The<br />

Chorus sings the antode, and in the two-line antikatakeleusmos the<br />

Leader bids the other combatant state his views. This is done in the<br />

antepirrhetne and antipnigos. The agon is sometimes concluded with<br />

the sphragis, a few lines spoken by the Leader of the Chorus announcing<br />

the winner of the debate, but this exceedingly archaic feature is more<br />

often absent than present in the comedies that have come down to us.<br />

Like the parabasis, the agon is evidently nothing but a highly specialized<br />

epirrhematic syzygy, formally distinguished by the preservation<br />

of both the pnige and by the presence of the conventional two-line<br />

katakeleusmoi, which are found nowhere else. It differs from the parabasis<br />

mainly in the fact that its contents are an organic part of the play,<br />

and a certain amount of adaptation to dramatic requirements is accordingly<br />

necessary. This is reflected in the composition of the epirrhemes,<br />

6 The extant agons are: Kn. 756-941, Clouds 950-1104, Wasps 526-724, Birds 451-<br />

628, Lys. 476-613, Frogs 895-1098, Eccl. 571-709 (defective), Plutus 487-626 (defective).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!