03.04.2013 Views

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

xlii General Introduction<br />

to be relegated to a subordinate position and finally were altogether dispossessed.<br />

We have now traced the history of comedy back to a period in which<br />

the plays consisted of parodos, agon, parabasis, and komos-gamos.<br />

This reconstruction is in the highest degree tentative and conjectural,<br />

but it is at least based on real evidence, which, though entirely internal<br />

and largely ambiguous, is nevertheless derived from genuine and extant<br />

documents. Any attempt, however, to penetrate still further into the<br />

past would be entirely jejune, for the obvious reason that it would<br />

have to draw its conclusions from materials which are themselves hypothetical<br />

reconstructions. The percentage of error thus becomes forbiddingly<br />

large, and the pleasures of free speculation under conditions so<br />

uncertain must not be allowed to blind us to the fact it is inevitably and<br />

distressingly ineffectual. We can, with a species of probability, carry<br />

the history of comedy back to a point at which derivation from some<br />

elaborate ritual sequence appears indubitable, but the fact that we<br />

possess no other evidence for the existence of such a rite means that<br />

an attempt to bridge the gap between the reconstructed form of early<br />

fifth-century comedy and its putative ritual ancestor will be a contribution<br />

to the study of religion rather than to the history of the drama.<br />

So much for the origins of Greek comedy and its development down<br />

to 425 B.C. The chief general characteristic of its later history has<br />

already been indicated and our task in what follows is mainly to illustrate<br />

the victorious progress of tragic influence. But it must be confessed<br />

in advance that we are very inadequately equipped to trace this<br />

development; our documents are neither numerous nor well distributed<br />

chronologically. The literary historian customarily distinguishes three<br />

periods in the history of Greek comedy: the Old, which ended with<br />

the fifth century, the Middle, which lasted until about 340 B.C., and<br />

the New, whose best work was produced around 300, although plays<br />

of this type continued to be composed even down into the Christian era.<br />

Of all the thousands of comedies which were written in ancient Greece<br />

we possess just fourteen. Nine of these belong to the last quarter of the<br />

fifth century, two of them to the early years of the fourth; we do not<br />

know the dates of the remaining three, but they can hardly be earlier<br />

than 315 or later than 290. None of this triad is preserved entire, but<br />

we have enough to form a reasonably good notion of what their total<br />

qualities must have been. The materials are thus relatively abundant for<br />

the latest phase of the Old Comedy and for the best period of the New,<br />

where the close imitations of the Roman Terence supplement the extant<br />

work of Menander, but the Middle Comedy is very inadequately represented<br />

by a pair of plays from the earliest years of its long history. The<br />

most serious disadvantage, however, lies in the fact that our documents

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!