03.04.2013 Views

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

THE BOOK WAS DRENCHED - OUDL Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

xxxviii General Introduction<br />

as the parabasis itself; their subject matter is just as thoroughly divorced<br />

from the action of the play, and the epirrhetnes are delivered by<br />

the Leader of the Chorus or the Leaders of the Semi-Choruses. Furthermore,<br />

it is not improbable that the Chorus turned and faced the audience<br />

on such occasions, for traces of the kommation sometimes appear. On<br />

the formal side we find exact responsion in the epirrhetnes, which sometimes<br />

culminate in pnige. Such syzygies may, with reference to their<br />

contents and structure, be called hypoparabases, but in the economy of<br />

the drama their function is that of the stasimon in tragedy; they are in<br />

this respect quite unspecialized, since they serve to separate, not the<br />

two halves of the play, but merely two individual scenes in it. Such<br />

syzygies occur only in the latter halves of those comedies in which they<br />

are found at all.<br />

In choral interludes of this anticipated type the adaptation of the<br />

epirrketnatic syzygy to dramatic requirements is very slight. Usually<br />

we can observe a more elaborate adaptation, in which the functions<br />

of two successive tragic stasima are assumed by the ode and the antode<br />

of a syzygy; the scenes thus defined are composed in pairs, and even<br />

though they are dialogue, with two or more speakers, and are written<br />

in iambic trimeters, they are essentially and formally the epirrhetnes<br />

of a syzygy which differs from those in the parabases chiefly in being<br />

really a part of the dramatic economy of the play. As a result of this<br />

we find that such episodic syzygies, to give them a special term, are<br />

far less rigid in the formal features of their epirrhetnes, and exact<br />

responsion is hardly ever observable. Really violent inequalities, however,<br />

very seldom occur, and even a maximum adaptation to dramatic<br />

requirements and a minimum strictness of form cannot entirely conceal<br />

the kinship of such pairs of scenes with the highly conventional syzygies<br />

which we find in the parabases. 4<br />

The lack of dramatic development in the series of short scenes which<br />

follow the parabasis makes this portion of the play ideally suited to the<br />

composition of episodic syzygies, and they are more numerous here than<br />

anywhere else, but the parodos also frequently contains one or more<br />

syzygies, which are extensively adapted to the generally dramatic character<br />

of this part of the comedy and consequently show little strictness of<br />

form in their non-lyric elements. The chief difference between them and<br />

the episodic variety is a matter of length; normally those in the parodos<br />

are relatively short. 5 A further point to be noted is that the relation be-<br />

4 The episodic syzygies are: Ach. 346-392, 393~571 1000-1068; Kn. 611-755;<br />

Peace 819-921, 922-1038; Birds 801-902, 1118-1266, 1494-1705; Frogs 460-604.<br />

5 The parodic syzygies are: Ach. 204-233, 284-346; Clouds 263-313; Wasps 333-<br />

402, 403-525; Lys. 254-285.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!