03.04.2013 Views

A Judge’s Guide

A Judge’s Guide

A Judge’s Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“We didn’t like the Mom; we couldn’t figure out why she’d lie for that guy. But we convicted<br />

because we couldn’t get the picture of that little girl out of our minds.” 223<br />

B. Dual Arrest Also Harms Children<br />

When police unnecessarily arrest both parents, children may be displaced into foster care,<br />

and removed from their schools and homes. 224 Understandably confused as to why their<br />

battered mother would be arrested, children can easily come to distrust a legal system that<br />

repeatedly punishes the victim. 225<br />

XII. THE COEXISTENCE OF FAMILY VIOLENCE AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE<br />

INCREASES DANGER TO CHILDREN.<br />

A. A chemically dependent batterer needs treatment for both his decision to batter and<br />

his decision to abuse substances. Abusers, their families and interveners too often use the<br />

substance abuse as an excuse for the violence, focusing only on the addiction instead of the<br />

combined problems. It has been proven that batterer’s intervention programs are more effective<br />

if the substance abuse is also treated. 226 In this way the intervener can confront the batterer’s<br />

“denial, rationalizations and faulty logic” regarding both the violence and substance abuse. 227<br />

Judges can order random urinalysis or hair tests to determine whether the batterer is abusing<br />

drugs or alcohol and if so, whether he is in compliance with the court’s order to abstain. 228<br />

B. Interveners must utilize a screening tool to determine which batterers are substance<br />

abusers. Specific assessments should be in place to determine the “the nature and extent of the<br />

individual’s battering pattern and substance abuse problem.” 229 The screening must accurately<br />

identify the severity and pattern of substance of abuse, to assist the intervener in assessing the<br />

level of possible danger to the victim. 230 Such screening should occur as early as possible,<br />

whether in a juvenile or family drug court, probation or parole intake units, or batterer’s<br />

intervention program.<br />

C. Since the victim is at greater risk for serious injury if the batterer is chemically<br />

dependent, all safety planning must include screening for such behavior. One study found<br />

that, at the time of committing their crimes, 60% of the batterers were under the influence of<br />

alcohol, 231 while another found that fully 92% of victims report that their batterers used drugs<br />

223<br />

I handled this case as a prosecutor in Norfolk County, MA. in 1991.<br />

224<br />

See, Laurel A. Kent, Addressing the Impact of Domestic Violence on Children: Alternatives to Laws<br />

Criminalizing the Commission of Domestic Violence in the Presence of a Child, 2001 Wis. L. Rev.1337, 1355<br />

(2001).<br />

225<br />

Id.<br />

226<br />

Oriel, supra note 6, at 495 ; and Gorney, supra note 6, at 229.<br />

227<br />

See Gorney, supra note 6 at 235.<br />

228<br />

In Travis County, Texas courts many judges will order immediate urinalysis tests to determine if a litigant has<br />

used substances, and if such tests indicate continuing use, random tests are then ordered for the future.<br />

229<br />

Albert R. Roberts, Substance Abuse Among Men Who Batter Their Mates, 5 J. SUBSTANCE ABUSE<br />

TREATMENT 87 (1988).<br />

230<br />

See Gorney, supra note 6, at 232.<br />

231<br />

Roberts, supra note 6, at 85.<br />

261

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!