A Judge’s Guide
A Judge’s Guide
A Judge’s Guide
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
“We didn’t like the Mom; we couldn’t figure out why she’d lie for that guy. But we convicted<br />
because we couldn’t get the picture of that little girl out of our minds.” 223<br />
B. Dual Arrest Also Harms Children<br />
When police unnecessarily arrest both parents, children may be displaced into foster care,<br />
and removed from their schools and homes. 224 Understandably confused as to why their<br />
battered mother would be arrested, children can easily come to distrust a legal system that<br />
repeatedly punishes the victim. 225<br />
XII. THE COEXISTENCE OF FAMILY VIOLENCE AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE<br />
INCREASES DANGER TO CHILDREN.<br />
A. A chemically dependent batterer needs treatment for both his decision to batter and<br />
his decision to abuse substances. Abusers, their families and interveners too often use the<br />
substance abuse as an excuse for the violence, focusing only on the addiction instead of the<br />
combined problems. It has been proven that batterer’s intervention programs are more effective<br />
if the substance abuse is also treated. 226 In this way the intervener can confront the batterer’s<br />
“denial, rationalizations and faulty logic” regarding both the violence and substance abuse. 227<br />
Judges can order random urinalysis or hair tests to determine whether the batterer is abusing<br />
drugs or alcohol and if so, whether he is in compliance with the court’s order to abstain. 228<br />
B. Interveners must utilize a screening tool to determine which batterers are substance<br />
abusers. Specific assessments should be in place to determine the “the nature and extent of the<br />
individual’s battering pattern and substance abuse problem.” 229 The screening must accurately<br />
identify the severity and pattern of substance of abuse, to assist the intervener in assessing the<br />
level of possible danger to the victim. 230 Such screening should occur as early as possible,<br />
whether in a juvenile or family drug court, probation or parole intake units, or batterer’s<br />
intervention program.<br />
C. Since the victim is at greater risk for serious injury if the batterer is chemically<br />
dependent, all safety planning must include screening for such behavior. One study found<br />
that, at the time of committing their crimes, 60% of the batterers were under the influence of<br />
alcohol, 231 while another found that fully 92% of victims report that their batterers used drugs<br />
223<br />
I handled this case as a prosecutor in Norfolk County, MA. in 1991.<br />
224<br />
See, Laurel A. Kent, Addressing the Impact of Domestic Violence on Children: Alternatives to Laws<br />
Criminalizing the Commission of Domestic Violence in the Presence of a Child, 2001 Wis. L. Rev.1337, 1355<br />
(2001).<br />
225<br />
Id.<br />
226<br />
Oriel, supra note 6, at 495 ; and Gorney, supra note 6, at 229.<br />
227<br />
See Gorney, supra note 6 at 235.<br />
228<br />
In Travis County, Texas courts many judges will order immediate urinalysis tests to determine if a litigant has<br />
used substances, and if such tests indicate continuing use, random tests are then ordered for the future.<br />
229<br />
Albert R. Roberts, Substance Abuse Among Men Who Batter Their Mates, 5 J. SUBSTANCE ABUSE<br />
TREATMENT 87 (1988).<br />
230<br />
See Gorney, supra note 6, at 232.<br />
231<br />
Roberts, supra note 6, at 85.<br />
261