GLOB.IDEALIZATION MOND.IDÉALISATION - Faculty of Social ...

11 | Mond.Idéalisation
Dan Herman | Polity Without Demos
is not properly covered by existing international law". 15 This technocratic
approach seeks to constrain non-conformative behaviour, both ex ante and
ex post, through a participative, delegated and reflexive approach to decisionmaking
that promises both input and output legitimacy. 16 In similar fashion,
Ruth Grant and Robert Keohane (2005) espouse a vision of accountability as
a meshed and networked paradigm, grafted onto individual mechanisms of
global governance where and how appropriate. 17
While such models of legal or administrative accountability are
indeed welcomed steps forward in a dialogue about how to improve
accountability in global governance, they both fail to pass the litmus test of
incorruptibility given their continued reliance on specific actors to shape the
legal framework within which their behaviour rests. As Chesterman
acknowledges, the possibility of capture remains, and the weakness of nonindustrialized
countries will continue to see their fate decided by the world’s
18/19
rule makers. Furthermore, Grant and Keohane admit that power
continues to shape the definition and conceptual lens of such accountability.
Weak states will continue to be subject to the whims of the powerful. 20
The
limited, if at times non-existent, engagement between polity and demos is by
15 Chesterman, S. (2008): 39.
16 Ibid: 49.
17 Grant R. and R. Keohane. (2005): 29-43.
18 Chesterman, S. (2008): 49.
19 The World Trade Organization is often identified as operating with the most ‘teeth’ given
the legal charter that constrains member state behaviour and establishes subsequent forums
for dispute resolution. Its ability to dictate recourse for plaintiffs, however, is still highly
correlated to the balance of power between disputants.
20 Grant R. and R. Keohane. (2005): 40.