04.04.2013 Views

GLOB.IDEALIZATION MOND.IDÉALISATION - Faculty of Social ...

GLOB.IDEALIZATION MOND.IDÉALISATION - Faculty of Social ...

GLOB.IDEALIZATION MOND.IDÉALISATION - Faculty of Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Phoebe Stephens | Equity Norms in Global Environmental Governance<br />

Convinced that climate change affects humanity as a whole and<br />

should be confronted within a global framework so as to take into<br />

account the vital interests <strong>of</strong> all mankind, 1. Recognizes that climate<br />

change is a common concern <strong>of</strong> mankind, since climate is an<br />

essential condition which sustains life on earth; (UN General<br />

Assembly, “Protection <strong>of</strong> Global Climate”)<br />

Northern countries generally opposed the CHM because <strong>of</strong> its<br />

contradictions with free-market principles and, as is detailed below, the<br />

Southern countries also came to oppose it due to sovereignty concerns<br />

(Bernstein 472). Compared to the Stockholm conference twenty years earlier,<br />

the CHM was on its last legs by time <strong>of</strong> the Rio Earth Summit. Whereas the<br />

CHM principle clearly served developing country interests with respect to<br />

international or global commons, such as the deep seabed, it did not hold for<br />

transboundary externalities such as biodiversity and carbon sequestration.<br />

By the 1990s tropical deforestation was <strong>of</strong> major global concern. This<br />

was due to the realization about the essential ecosystem services that tropical<br />

rainforests perform for the world and the alarming rates <strong>of</strong> deforestation that<br />

were occurring in vital tropical rainforests like the Amazon (Dietz and Henry<br />

13189). The rhetoric momentarily shifted as developed countries pointed to<br />

forests’ roles as carbon sinks and their unique biodiversity and aesthetic to<br />

emphasize their global value, leading to the conceptualization <strong>of</strong> forests as<br />

CHM (Davenport 107). Although this position may appear to contradict the<br />

North’s traditional stance, it must also be noted that tropical rainforests are<br />

abundant in <strong>of</strong>ten pr<strong>of</strong>itable genetic resources and the North may have had<br />

ulterior motives in promoting tropical rainforests forests as CHM. Of course,<br />

Glob.Idealization |32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!