05.04.2013 Views

Appendices 5-13 - Nautilus Cares - Nautilus Minerals

Appendices 5-13 - Nautilus Cares - Nautilus Minerals

Appendices 5-13 - Nautilus Cares - Nautilus Minerals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The calculation of the complete pre-mining removal and placement operation (comprising the<br />

surface unconsolidated sediments and some hard rock competent waste) using the ROV and<br />

the Seafloor Mining Tool (SMT) was undertaken with the SSFATE model described herein. This<br />

operation will be carried out, intermittently, as required over a 20 month period.<br />

The SSFATE simulations demonstrated that due to the fast falling velocity of the coarse sands<br />

and heavier materials, these larger particles would fall down-slope, but near the tip head sites.<br />

In contrast, the finer particles, the clays and silts would spread more widely since their lower fall<br />

velocities enabled them to be carried by the tidal currents before settling.<br />

Figure 3.1 shows the depositional thicknesses of the placement from the ROV and SMT<br />

excavated pre-mining material surrounding the Solwara 1 mining lease site after this operation is<br />

completed in full. Bottom thicknesses, shown in Figure 3.1, varied from 0.18 mm to small areas<br />

adjacent to the tip heads site slightly exceeding 500 mm or 0.5m. Some deposition was noted to<br />

fall outside the areas shown in Figure 3.1, but at a thickness that was less than the measured<br />

natural sedimentation rate for the site (being 0.18 mm over a 20 month period).<br />

The model results also detailed the composition of the benthic loading in the area as shown in<br />

Figure 3.2 for the mining sites and Figure 3.3 for the area in general. Figure 3.2 shows the<br />

particle size distributions for sediment that returned to the mining zone, while Figures 3.3a to<br />

Figure 3.3e show the extent of the individual sediment size classes. The coarse sands were<br />

found to settle very close to the tip head sites, given the larger settling velocities of these<br />

particles. These sands are predicted to mound near the tip head site by SSFATE. This is to be<br />

expected, although the SSFATE model does not account for post settlement slumping or any<br />

instability associated with these higher sediment peaks. It is possible that these mounds may<br />

collapse and spread the coarser sands down the slope of the Solwara-1 mound. In contrast, the<br />

significant quantities of clays and silts within the unconsolidated sediments have very low<br />

settling velocities and hence are subjected to the ambient currents. While the SSFATE model<br />

accounts for the bathymetric profile of the site as shown in Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.3, a small<br />

proportion of these clays, silts and some fine sands are predicted to settle back on the mining<br />

site (maximum thickness on mining area < 376mm) due to the ambient currents and vertical<br />

turbulence. Indeed, the benthic loading predicted within the mining boundaries, shown in Figure<br />

3.2 and Figure 3.3, is comprised of these clays, silts and fine sands from the unconsolidated<br />

sediments.<br />

Page 10 of 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!