05.04.2013 Views

Appendices 5-13 - Nautilus Cares - Nautilus Minerals

Appendices 5-13 - Nautilus Cares - Nautilus Minerals

Appendices 5-13 - Nautilus Cares - Nautilus Minerals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

* Noise levels attenuate rapidly with range out to about 2 km, after which they drop<br />

off more slowly. This is due to the increasingly important contribution of seabed<br />

reflected sound at longer ranges.<br />

* Results for different azimuths are similar, indicating that the overall seabed<br />

topography has a relatively minor effect. However, some bathymetry profiles<br />

result in distinct focussing effects, resulting in localised increases in received<br />

sound levels.<br />

* At very short range the reduction in sound level with increasing range corresponds<br />

to spherical spreading (see Table 3 and Figure 10), but this approximation<br />

becomes successively worse as the range increases and the contributions of the<br />

seabed and sea surface reflections become more important.<br />

* At ranges beyond 2 km the rate of reduction of maximum received level<br />

corresponds well to cylindrical spreading (see Figure 10). This is to be expected<br />

given that the sea surface and basalt seabed are almost perfect reflectors at small<br />

grazing angles, and even the sandy silt seabed has a high reflection coefficient at<br />

these angles (see Figure 5). In addition, the sound speed profile in Figure 6 will<br />

result in sound being refracted away from the boundaries, towards the depth of the<br />

sound speed minimum at around 1000 m, further reducing boundary losses.<br />

Seawater absorption losses are very small at these frequencies and ranges, so the<br />

only significant loss mechanism is spreading in the horizontal plane. It would<br />

therefore be reasonable to use the following formula, based on cylindrical<br />

spreading and a best-fit effective source level, to predict the maximum received<br />

level at longer ranges:<br />

RL 172 -10log10<br />

+ r,<br />

) (1)<br />

where RL is the received level (dB re 1 "Pa), and r is the horizontal range in<br />

metres. Note that this formula is only valid for ranges greater than 2 km and small<br />

enough that absorption isn't a significant factor. Absorption increases strongly<br />

with increasing frequency and therefore acts as a low-pass filter. For a reasonably<br />

narrow band source spectrum like the one considered here its effects can be<br />

included approximately by modifying (1) as follows:<br />

+ r,<br />

ar<br />

RL 172 -10log<br />

-<br />

(2)<br />

) 10<br />

where a is the absorption coefficient at the centre frequency in dB/m. A formula<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!