Appendices 5-13 - Nautilus Cares - Nautilus Minerals
Appendices 5-13 - Nautilus Cares - Nautilus Minerals
Appendices 5-13 - Nautilus Cares - Nautilus Minerals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.5 Comparison to ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) water quality guidelines<br />
The dissolved concentrations of Co, Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb exceed the<br />
ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guideline values for 95% protection level at all three<br />
temperatures (see <strong>Appendices</strong> 1 and 5). At 6 o C zinc exceeded the guideline value by<br />
approximately 250 times, with Co, Cu, Cd and Pb exceeding the Guideline values by<br />
approximately 100, 120, 4 and 20 times, respectively. Therefore, if the ore slurry was<br />
maintained at 6 o C a 300 fold dilution would reduce all metal concentrations to below<br />
the guideline level for 95% protection, a more conservative dilution of 500 fold would<br />
reduce all metal concentrations to below the guideline value for 99% protection,<br />
except for Co. However, the Co value of 0.005 !g/l is actually below the natural<br />
background levels for Co in coastal environments of northern Australia (Munksgaard<br />
and Parry, 2001).<br />
The temperature experiment resulted in higher concentrations of metals at 12 and<br />
24 o C with Zn exceeding the ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guideline value for 95%<br />
protection by approximately 600 times. Cobalt, Cu, Cd and Pb exceeded the<br />
guideline values by approximately 220, 300, 10 and 34-45 (12 and 24 o C,<br />
respectively). Therefore a minimum of 600 fold dilution would reduce all mmetal<br />
concentrations below the ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guideline values for 95%<br />
protection level.<br />
4. Conclusions<br />
The results of both the Phase 1 and 2 experiments indicate that there is an existing<br />
oxidized surface layer on the ore sample resulting in the rapid release of Mn, Co, Cu,<br />
Zn, Cd, Pb and sulfate. The Phase 1 experiment at 6 o C showed that after the initial<br />
dissolution of this oxidized layer substantially slower dissolution from the exposed<br />
metal sulfide surface commenced. If the oxidized layer was due to air oxidation the<br />
results obtained in these experiments may represent a worst case scenario. The ore<br />
being mined in situ will mix with oxygenated seawater, not air, and this will result in<br />
substantially slower rates of metal sulfide oxidation (see Batterham, 1999) and<br />
concomitantly lower rates of metal dissolution.<br />
Batterham (1999) removed the oxidized surface from a mixed metal sulfide ore<br />
concentrate and showed that the initial rate of dissolution for Cd, Cu and Zn in oxic<br />
20