05.04.2013 Views

The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the

The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the

The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

156 LIFE OF SIR ROWLAND HILL. [1850<br />

number <strong>of</strong> persons relieved to about eight thous<strong>and</strong>,<br />

concludes as follows :<br />

"<br />

In reference to <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> total abolition <strong>of</strong> it<br />

Sunday duty<br />

should be remarked<br />

"<br />

First, that its advocates wholly overlook <strong>the</strong> interests <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poor.<br />

To be obliged to resort, as has been proposed in case <strong>of</strong> need, to <strong>the</strong><br />

electric telegraph, or to a shilling postage, would be a severe tax<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> poor man ; <strong>and</strong>,<br />

" Secondly, that <strong>the</strong> Government, having a monopoly<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> de-<br />

livery <strong>of</strong> letters, cannot refuse to deliver <strong>the</strong>m except in places where<br />

<strong>the</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> is practically unanimous. Numerous small places (about<br />

four hundred probably) have preferred such a request, <strong>and</strong> it has<br />

been complied with. Several, however, finding <strong>the</strong> non-delivery<br />

inconvenient, have requested that <strong>the</strong> delivery may be resumed;<br />

<strong>and</strong> it has been resumed accordingly."<br />

While <strong>the</strong> above was in preparation I received a<br />

letter from Lord Ashley, urging me to hold out<br />

expectations that Government would make fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

reductions in <strong>the</strong> Sunday duty, admitting that we<br />

"had already done a great deal," <strong>and</strong>, oddly enough,<br />

inferring <strong>the</strong>refrom that we could do much more.<br />

Not agreeing in this conclusion, I was obliged to<br />

decline giving <strong>the</strong> pledge required.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> following day, viz., that fixed for <strong>the</strong> motion,<br />

I had my first interview with <strong>the</strong> Premier, waiting<br />

upon him by<br />

his desire. After a time <strong>the</strong> Chancellor<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Exchequer came in ; both agreed that <strong>the</strong><br />

motion must be resisted, but I left <strong>the</strong>m in fear<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y were not sufficiently prepared for <strong>the</strong> en-<br />

counter ; I was desired to be under <strong>the</strong> gallery <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> House <strong>of</strong> Commons. <strong>The</strong> following entry in my<br />

Journal<br />

records what occurred :<br />

''May 3Oth. At five o'clock went to <strong>the</strong> House <strong>of</strong> Commons.<br />

. . . . owing partly to Lord Ashley having omitted <strong>the</strong> most<br />

objectionable part <strong>of</strong> his motion (<strong>the</strong> stoppage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mails), <strong>and</strong> still<br />

more, I fear, to <strong>the</strong> cowardice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> . members, . . <strong>the</strong> motion<br />

was carried, by ninety-three to sixty-eight."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!