05.04.2013 Views

The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the

The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the

The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

470<br />

APPENDIX I.<br />

in each case by <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> ocean postage received,"* <strong>the</strong> following<br />

is <strong>the</strong> rule observed :<br />

Whenever <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> ocean postage is below <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

line <strong>of</strong> packets by which <strong>the</strong> service is performed, <strong>the</strong> Post Office<br />

debits itself, for packet service, with a charge just equal to <strong>the</strong> ocean<br />

postage received. In <strong>the</strong> only two lines <strong>of</strong> packets (viz., those<br />

between Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> France, <strong>and</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Belgium), in which<br />

<strong>the</strong> ocean postage exceeds <strong>the</strong> cost, <strong>the</strong> department debits itself with<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole expense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> packet service.<br />

Whatever may be thought <strong>of</strong> this arrangement, it will scarcely be<br />

maintained that it is too favourable to <strong>the</strong> Post Office, which, save in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two packet services just mentioned (which now jointly<br />

yield a surplus <strong>of</strong> about ^5 6,000 per annum), is debited with an<br />

amount equal to its whole receipts (viz., ^470,000), without even<br />

any allowance for <strong>the</strong> expense it incurs in that portion<br />

packet administration which is necessarily<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

carried on within <strong>the</strong><br />

department.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Eighth Annual Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Postmaster-General f contains an<br />

estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> net revenue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Post Office for <strong>the</strong> year 1861,<br />

prepared on <strong>the</strong> principles laid down in <strong>the</strong> foregoing remarks, but<br />

including some less important adjustments shown in <strong>the</strong> document<br />

itself.<br />

<strong>The</strong> net revenue thus determined is ^1,161,985, <strong>the</strong> whole, save<br />

<strong>the</strong> ^56,000 mentioned above, <strong>and</strong> about ^30,000 derived from<br />

money-order transactions, being <strong>the</strong> produce <strong>of</strong> inl<strong>and</strong> postage, which<br />

thus yields a net revenue <strong>of</strong> about ^1,076,000.<br />

Second. I now proceed to consider <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> net revenue<br />

as to its comparative amount, when contrasted with <strong>the</strong> net revenue<br />

obtained before <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> Penny Postage, <strong>the</strong> object being<br />

to ascertain <strong>the</strong> loss consequent on <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rate. When<br />

proposing Penny Postage, I estimated this loss (under different cir-<br />

cumstances, however,) at about ^300,000.!<br />

<strong>The</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> net revenue in <strong>the</strong> year 1838, <strong>the</strong> last year<br />

throughout which <strong>the</strong> old rates were maintained, was, according to<br />

<strong>the</strong> mode <strong>of</strong> account <strong>the</strong>n in use, 1, 659,5 IO - For <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

comparison,<br />

it is obvious that a similar mode <strong>of</strong> account must be<br />

applied to <strong>the</strong> present state <strong>of</strong> things.<br />

Bearing this in mind, we have now once more to consider <strong>the</strong> two<br />

* Letter to Postmaster-General, loth January, 1860. f Pp- 20-22.<br />

I " Second Report <strong>of</strong> Select Committee on Postage (1843)," question 11,070.<br />

"Eighth Report <strong>of</strong> Postmaster-General," p. 31.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!