05.04.2013 Views

The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the

The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the

The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

i855~9] MR. ROBERT STEPHENSON. 341<br />

CONTROVERSY WITH MR. ROBERT STEPHENSON.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> this period I was reluctantly<br />

drawn into controversy with <strong>the</strong> eminent engineer,<br />

Mr. Robert Stephenson, <strong>the</strong>n President <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Society<br />

<strong>of</strong> Civil Engineers, who, in his inaugural address,<br />

in defiance <strong>of</strong> facts, with which, at his request, I<br />

had supplied him, represented <strong>the</strong> railway system as<br />

essential to <strong>the</strong> fiscal success <strong>of</strong> penny postage, <strong>and</strong><br />

even to <strong>the</strong> conveyance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mails : <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n proceeded<br />

to charge <strong>the</strong> Post Office with harsh <strong>and</strong><br />

unjust dealing in relation to <strong>the</strong> railway companies,<br />

<strong>and</strong> with uncertainty, irregularity, <strong>and</strong> delay in its<br />

own proceedings. <strong>The</strong> dissatisfaction which I natu-<br />

rally felt <strong>and</strong> expressed at statements <strong>and</strong> charges so<br />

unfounded, being reported to Mr. Stephenson, drew<br />

from him a letter in which he expressed regret at<br />

my annoyance, thanked me for <strong>the</strong> information<br />

supplied to him, admitted " all <strong>the</strong> principal facts<br />

<strong>the</strong>rein stated," but retained his own conclusions ; at<br />

<strong>the</strong> same time deprecating controversy, <strong>and</strong> speaking<br />

in <strong>the</strong> highest terms <strong>of</strong> my public services. To<br />

remove, as far as practicable, <strong>the</strong> erroneous impression<br />

necessarily produced by Mr. Stephenson's address,<br />

which <strong>of</strong> course could not be affected by his private<br />

letter, I requested Mr. Edward Page, <strong>the</strong> Inspector-<br />

General <strong>of</strong> Mails, as <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficer most conversant with<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole subject, to prepare a complete exposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> case ; <strong>and</strong> this, drawn up with<br />

Mr. Page's usual care <strong>and</strong> ability, appeared in <strong>the</strong><br />

Appendix to <strong>the</strong> Second Report<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Postmaster-<br />

General (p. 45), <strong>and</strong>, I may add, will still repay<br />

perusal. In a subsequent address, however, to <strong>the</strong><br />

Institution, Mr. Stephenson, without any effectual<br />

answer to Mr. Page's definite <strong>and</strong> accurate statements,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!