10.04.2013 Views

Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis

Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis

Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

artist who tried to follow <strong>the</strong> correct path but failed 55 . Those kinds of examples were<br />

many 56 . Never<strong>the</strong>less, it needs to be remembered that even <strong>the</strong> most notable <strong>and</strong><br />

officially approved works of socialist realism contained often double meanings <strong>and</strong><br />

hidden purposes. That was <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> many works of Šostakovič. People still like to<br />

speculate <strong>the</strong> real motives <strong>and</strong> message of his works. This means that <strong>the</strong> system wasn’t<br />

total in that sense. However, socialist realism was a unanimous codification or an<br />

aes<strong>the</strong>tic <strong>the</strong>ory of <strong>the</strong> rulers who attempted to create a totalitarian system <strong>and</strong> to rule<br />

over <strong>the</strong> whole culture. The system didn’t function conclusively as we can note when<br />

considering <strong>the</strong> art products but <strong>the</strong> laws of its existence followed <strong>the</strong> totalitarian<br />

ideology. The socialist realist cultural system was enhanced by <strong>the</strong> society that<br />

participated in that sense in <strong>the</strong> totalitarian project.<br />

2.2.1.2 Socialist Realism as an Ideology<br />

The second statement is ‘socialist realism as an ideology’ as Gutkin 57 has stated. This<br />

approach is problematic since it doesn’t take into account <strong>the</strong> totalitarian aspect of <strong>the</strong><br />

concept or see it as a monolithic system which was certainly one of its qualities. I see<br />

that socialist realism functioned as an ideology only at a <strong>the</strong>oretical level <strong>and</strong> only as<br />

one of <strong>the</strong> goals of <strong>the</strong> high Stalinist culture. However if one looks at <strong>the</strong> practice, i.e.<br />

socialist realist artworks, <strong>the</strong> statement becomes complex. Should <strong>the</strong>y be viewed as<br />

products of some ideological thinking?<br />

Gutkin 58 writes rightfully that behind <strong>the</strong> socialist realism <strong>the</strong>re was a set of concepts<br />

<strong>and</strong> views, such as ‘utopia about a new society or a new man’ which different avantgarde<br />

branches shared toge<strong>the</strong>r. However, I see that <strong>the</strong> shared views were related to <strong>the</strong><br />

formation of socialist realist aes<strong>the</strong>tics but not necessary to <strong>the</strong> ready made <strong>the</strong>ory in<br />

itself because in a ready made concept it reached a totalitarian form, i.e. ‘a means to<br />

55<br />

See Herrala 2002.<br />

56<br />

See for example <strong>the</strong> article by Nicholas Reyl<strong>and</strong> ”Engineering <strong>the</strong> Soul” (2001), which is concentrated<br />

in Lutoslawskij’s difficulties in Pol<strong>and</strong>, where <strong>the</strong> musicological sphere was dominated by one of <strong>the</strong><br />

most famous Polish communist musicologists Sofia Lissa. “[T]hey could never be sure if <strong>the</strong> music<br />

would be condemned or rewarded – however hard <strong>the</strong>y were trying.” (Reyl<strong>and</strong> 2001, p. 2.)<br />

57<br />

Gutkin 1999, p. 2.<br />

58<br />

See Ibid.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!