Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis
Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis
Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
continuity. 267 In order to underst<strong>and</strong> basics of Asaf’ev’s ideas in concrete sense, it is<br />
useful to take a closer look at his article “Pathways into <strong>the</strong> Future”.<br />
Asaf’ev approaches Russian musical current from <strong>the</strong> past <strong>and</strong> goes through its<br />
European roots <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> heritage of Russian intelligentsia. As a result, he sets a question:<br />
“Where is <strong>the</strong> face of our music” <strong>and</strong> what are <strong>the</strong> pathways into <strong>the</strong> future? 268<br />
According to him, despite <strong>the</strong> big influence of German music, Russian classical music<br />
contains certain Russian peculiarities. For instance, how <strong>the</strong> ancient folksong, with a<br />
combination of Western norms, has resulted in <strong>the</strong> so-called dilettante-Russian style,<br />
beloved of all Russian composers? Asaf’ev formulations bring forth language typical to<br />
his later works he sates: “<strong>the</strong> element of melos infected <strong>the</strong> pale schemes [meaning<br />
Western methods] with its vital impulse <strong>and</strong> created seductive mirages of genuine folk<br />
art (Rimskij-Korsakov’s Kitež, Borodin’s Prince Igor <strong>and</strong> Ljadov’s Kikimora).” 269<br />
Asaf’ev’s classification of Russian composers expressed in <strong>the</strong> article is very<br />
interesting. For example Čajkovskij <strong>and</strong> Musorgskij are, according to him, <strong>the</strong> only<br />
composers who cannot be reproved for adopting a false approach to folksong. Asaf’ev<br />
takes a closer look at <strong>the</strong> individual Russian composers <strong>and</strong> speculates <strong>the</strong> possible<br />
pathways leading from <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> future. He evaluates <strong>the</strong> total creativity of individual<br />
composers, not just <strong>the</strong>ir works or style, but <strong>the</strong>ir whole artistic attitude, psychological<br />
aspects: <strong>the</strong>ir creative personality. Roughly speaking, Asaf’ev divides composers into<br />
two categories: subjective <strong>and</strong> objective, which he calls different degrees of<br />
psychologism. 270 By this he means that <strong>the</strong> utmost objectivity leads to psychological<br />
indifference 271 while <strong>the</strong> extreme subjectivity leads to egoism. 272 Although Bergson’s<br />
267 Biography 1984, p. 86.<br />
268 Asaf’ev: Pathways 2003, p. 236.<br />
269 Ibid., p. 238.<br />
270 “[w]ith regard to <strong>the</strong> content of musical consciousness, which take shape as <strong>the</strong> course of a single<br />
creative process, but in which at times <strong>the</strong> personal state of soul is predominant (that means, <strong>the</strong> creative<br />
impulses are rooted in <strong>the</strong> egoism of <strong>the</strong> composer, in his mental states), <strong>and</strong> in o<strong>the</strong>r times <strong>the</strong>y are<br />
reflection of perceptions introduced from outside, from <strong>the</strong> sphere of <strong>the</strong> super-human world.” (Ibid., p.<br />
242.)<br />
271 “From <strong>the</strong>re arises a perception of <strong>the</strong> cosmos as static, which schematizes everything on one plane<br />
<strong>and</strong> accepts even <strong>the</strong> spiritual quality itself (<strong>the</strong> upsurge of life) at <strong>the</strong> stage of motionless concentration.<br />
Composers with this cast of creative thought are usually inclined to make music geometrical.” (Ibid., p.<br />
246.)<br />
272 See ibid.<br />
74