10.04.2013 Views

Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis

Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis

Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

does not result <strong>the</strong> absolute truth about <strong>the</strong> content of things. It possesses only relative<br />

knowledge <strong>and</strong> symbolic character. Thus Bergson reacts negatively towards <strong>the</strong><br />

teleological view. Never<strong>the</strong>less, he gives a high valuation to intellectual knowledge in<br />

<strong>the</strong> sphere of practical reality. Bergson states that besides positive knowledge <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

yet absolute knowledge, which is attainable through intuition. 253 Intuition can fulfil<br />

those assignments that intelligence can not. It is peculiar intellectual sympathy “by<br />

means of which we penetrate <strong>the</strong> inner of <strong>the</strong> object” to be able to pour toge<strong>the</strong>r its<br />

individuality, consequently inexpressible in general underst<strong>and</strong>ings of <strong>the</strong> environment,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to comprehend it as a personal being. 254 Losskij writes that according to Bergson<br />

[t]he intuitive knowledge attains <strong>the</strong> cognizable object immediately as a whole <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

<strong>the</strong> different indivisible sides of an object appear as a basis of <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>and</strong> from <strong>the</strong><br />

whole. Secondly, <strong>the</strong> intuitive knowledge is <strong>the</strong> contemplation of <strong>the</strong> very things to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

genuine content <strong>and</strong> thus it possesses an absolute character, meanwhile <strong>the</strong> rational<br />

knowledge consists of symbols <strong>and</strong> consequently, possesses a relative character. Thirdly,<br />

<strong>the</strong> intuitive knowledge gives at once <strong>the</strong> whole endless richness of <strong>the</strong> content of an<br />

object, meanwhile rational knowledge only wants to exhaust <strong>the</strong> object, forcing one to<br />

build an endless line of general underst<strong>and</strong>ings that are connected to each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Naturally, it is clear that this kind of line never remains complete. 255<br />

Finally <strong>and</strong> fourth of all, Bergson states that <strong>the</strong> creative changeability (la durée), <strong>the</strong><br />

instability of reality, is given in intuition, whereas <strong>the</strong> general knowledge is achieved<br />

through <strong>the</strong> rational knowledge which is considered to be only static, general state of<br />

objects. The assignment of intuition is thus to reach <strong>the</strong> most ‘doing’ of object. In order<br />

our consciousness to coincide with an object in its being, it is required that it looks aside<br />

from <strong>the</strong> readiness (tout fait) <strong>and</strong> concentrate upon what is being created (se faisant).<br />

“We use intuition first of all for penetration to <strong>the</strong> hiding-place of our ego, our<br />

personality, <strong>and</strong> we discover that with a help of it we can open <strong>the</strong> most important<br />

questions of philosophy of mind, for example question about free will, which reminds<br />

eternal puzzle for intelligence.” 256<br />

253 Ibid.<br />

254 Ibid., pp. 17–18.<br />

255 Ibid.<br />

256 Ibid., pp. 18–19.<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!