10.04.2013 Views

Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis

Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis

Boris Asaf'ev and the Soviet Musicology - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Asaf’ev emphasized musicology as ’living’ <strong>and</strong> he wanted to relate <strong>the</strong> research to<br />

contemporary life. 152<br />

The main achievement of his work at <strong>the</strong> institute was De Musica, collections of essays<br />

edited by him (1925, 1926 <strong>and</strong> 1927) <strong>and</strong> praised by Lunačarskij in his article of <strong>the</strong><br />

journal Vestnik Kommunističeskoj akademii (The Communistic Academy<br />

Messenger). 153 However, many scholarly works written under <strong>the</strong> guidance of Asaf’ev<br />

were later charged of formalism (mainly those concerning contemporary musical<br />

techniques). Mikhail Druskin who fought for <strong>the</strong> “modernism” wrote a book New Piano<br />

Music (1928). 154 It was charged in 1948. The former student of Asaf’ev, Aleksej<br />

Olkohvskij writes that “up to <strong>the</strong> mid-thirties very few of <strong>the</strong> [Leningrad] Institute’s<br />

collaborators deemed it necessary to base <strong>the</strong>ir conclusions exclusively on <strong>the</strong> doctrines<br />

of ‘Marxism-Leninism’” <strong>and</strong> that most of <strong>the</strong>m were “ei<strong>the</strong>r pupils of Asaf’ev or<br />

completely shared his views, <strong>the</strong> activity of <strong>the</strong> [musical] section had <strong>the</strong> clearly<br />

expressed character of free idealistic investigation which was evident in <strong>the</strong> work of<br />

Asaf’ev himself.” 155 Only by leafing through <strong>the</strong> articles of De Musica, one can observe<br />

that Olkhovsky’s book contains a lot of truth despite its subjective <strong>and</strong> emotional tone.<br />

According to Druskin <strong>the</strong>re was a great deal of rivalry between <strong>the</strong> historical schools of<br />

Leningrad <strong>and</strong> Moscow Conservatories in <strong>the</strong> 1920s <strong>and</strong> 1930s. Mihail V. Ivanov-<br />

Borečkij (1874–1936) stressed more historic-cultural factors in Moscow, while Asaf’ev<br />

wanted to combine musico-historical aspects with <strong>the</strong>oretical ones. The Moscow<br />

Conservatory was <strong>the</strong> leading star in <strong>the</strong> field of <strong>the</strong>ory. 156<br />

At large, Asaf’ev’s position among musicological authors of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Soviet</strong> Union was<br />

unbreakable. 157 However, <strong>the</strong>re were many o<strong>the</strong>r talented musicologists at <strong>the</strong> time who<br />

could have earned <strong>the</strong> same status that was given to Asaf’ev on 1940s. According to my<br />

personal information, a group of <strong>Soviet</strong> scholars tried in <strong>the</strong> 1970’s to promote <strong>the</strong> name<br />

152<br />

Schwarz 1983, pp. 89–92.<br />

153<br />

Lunačargskij 1971, p. 201.<br />

154<br />

Preface was written by his teacher Asaf’ev (Schwarz 1983, p. 128).<br />

155<br />

Olkhovsky 1955, p. 60. Olkhovsky emigrated from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Soviet</strong> Union to <strong>the</strong> United States in 1949.<br />

156<br />

Schwarz 1983, p. 380.<br />

157<br />

See for example <strong>the</strong> preface by Orlova of <strong>the</strong> book Muzykal’naja forma kak process (Musical Form as<br />

a Process) 1971, p. 6.<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!