25.04.2013 Views

ajAti vAda

ajAti vAda

ajAti vAda

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

names, araNya, ASrama, parvata, vana and sAgara are quite rarely seen nowadays. All<br />

daSanAmI monks belong to the tradition of ekadaNDI sam.nyAsa. They carry a staff<br />

consisting of a single wooden stick, symbolizing the essential identity of brahman and<br />

Atman.<br />

It is important to remember that the advaita sampradAya is not a Saiva sect. The fact that<br />

both the prominent non-advaita schools of vedAnta are vaishNava leads to a confusion<br />

among many modern researchers, who uncritically talk of all daSanAmI sannyAsIs as<br />

being Saiva ascetics. In reality, advaitins are non-sectarian, and they advocate worship of<br />

Siva and vishNu equally with that of the other deities of Hinduism, like Sakti, gaNapati<br />

and others. Modern neo-vedAntins, who are most strongly influenced by advaita<br />

vedAnta, have no trouble accepting Moses, Christ and Muhammad also. Philosophically,<br />

classical advaita would disagree as much with the Saiva siddhAnta and the Saiva<br />

vedAnta schools, as with the vaishNava schools of vedAnta. On the other hand, the God<br />

Siva is the archetype of the ascetic, and advaita vedAnta lays great emphasis on<br />

sam.nyAsa. Saiva schools also tend to be more non-dualistic in outlook than vaishNava<br />

schools, and SankarAcArya himself is venerated as an incarnation of Siva. Hence, the<br />

contemporary SankarAcAryas do wield a larger degree of influence among Saiva<br />

communities than among vaishNava communities, but that does not necessarily make<br />

them exclusively Saiva ascetics. The famous madhusUdana sarasvatI was an ardent<br />

devotee of kRshNa, while prakASAnanda was a Sakti-worshipper.<br />

The major following of the gurus of the advaita tradition has been mostly among the<br />

smArtas, who integrate the domestic Vedic ritual with devotional aspects of Hinduism.<br />

The traditional pancAyatana pUjA scheme of smArta worship is offered to Siva, vishNu,<br />

Sakti, gaNeSa and sUrya, as aspects of saguNa brahman. skanda is sometimes added as<br />

the sixth important deity who is worshipped, especially in the south. The smArtas also<br />

regard themselves as followers of SankarAcArya and his successors at the various<br />

maThas, but there is a lot of regional variation in this regard.<br />

The AmnAya maThas: The four maThas established by Sankara are known in the<br />

tradition as the AmnAya maThas. Sankara is said to have assigned one of the four vedas<br />

to each of these maThas, and the AcAryas and paNDitas of these four maThas continue<br />

the tradition to this day. Accordingly, the Puri maTha is associated with the Rg veda,<br />

Sringeri with yajurveda, Dvaraka with sAma veda and Jyotirmath with atharva veda.<br />

The ten daSanAmI suffixes are distributed among these four maThas - according to most<br />

traditions, purI, bhAratI and sarasvatI with Sringeri; tIrtha and ASrama with Dvaraka;<br />

sAgara, parvata and giri with Jyotirmath, and vana and araNya with Puri. Many notable<br />

post-Sankaran authors, including sureSvara, jnAnaghana, jnAnottama, Anandagiri,<br />

bhAratI tIrtha, vidyAraNya and others, can be found among the heads of these maThas.<br />

Of these four, Sringeri is the only institution that has had an unbroken line of succession<br />

from Sankara. Among the other three maThas, the succession has been interrupted at one<br />

time or the other, for a variety of historical reasons. The longest hiatus in the line of<br />

succession was in the case of Jyotirmath, where the seat lay vacant for around 165 years.<br />

In the recent past, the Sringeri maTha has been involved, directly or indirectly, in<br />

stabilizing the line of succession in the other three maThas.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!