01.05.2013 Views

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98 NOTES ON ENGLISH RUBI.<br />

of a few dried branches can lead to a real acquaintance witli a<br />

difficult bramble. It would be more instructive to examine the<br />

living plant, but nobody can visit all localities where doubtful<br />

species are growing.<br />

It would be tedious to enumerate all the various difficulties<br />

"which we cannot escape in these researches. The question arises<br />

are we obliged to waste our time in studymg the foolish writings of<br />

every ignorant and mischievous manufacturer of names ? A neglect<br />

of such productions has nothing to do with the esteem we pay to<br />

the work of our true predecessors in science.<br />

Several botanists have thought that knowledge would profit<br />

more from a diminution of the numerous species than fi'om an<br />

increase. Therefore they combined a great number of different<br />

forms, producing in this manner an aggregate species. The easiest<br />

way to escape all difficulties would be to establish a liiibus i>ohjworphus,<br />

as Spanner did. In following his example we either<br />

obstruct scientific research, or, if we admit subspecies and varieties,<br />

we change the terms only. At present we are accustomed to say<br />

Tailim suhercctns, R. plicutus, &c., but it is a matter of mere<br />

convenience if we should prefer to alter this nomenclature into<br />

E. fntticnsits subsp. suherectns and snbsp. plicatiis. Science would<br />

neither be improved nor damaged by this arrangement. In other<br />

groups of our brambles the question is much more intricate.<br />

Certainly the limits of the separate forms are often very difficult<br />

to trace ; but between the aggregate species, comprehending all<br />

connecting links, exist no limits at all.<br />

My own opinion is that in such genera as Rubus, Rosa, Tlierdcinw<br />

and many others, hybridization once has mixed the old species,<br />

with the effect of producing, in the course of many hundred years,<br />

numerous new species of a lower order. At present we see exactly<br />

the same occur in the Rhododendrons, Fuchsias, Begonias, Abutilous,<br />

and many other favourite plants of our gardens. In all the<br />

second-rank species, originated in tlie woods or in cultivation, the<br />

jDollen contains a considerable number of imperfect grains. There<br />

are only three English blackberries which have quite regular<br />

pollen-grains, viz., R. cceuus, R. rusticainis, and R. firatiis.<br />

These views do not necessarily lead to the conclusion that at<br />

present there must take place abundant intercrossing between all<br />

our existing brambles. R. cashis, R. restitus {leiicostachijs), and R.<br />

nisticaniis (on the Continent R. tomentosxis and R. rudis too) are very<br />

much inclined to produce hybrids as well inter se as with many<br />

other species. Everywhere we observe associated with them a good<br />

many perplexing intermediate forms and connecting links resisting<br />

all attempts at classification. We must not fancy that hybrids are<br />

always rare. On the Continent the R. casiiis x Lhciis, a hybrid<br />

which I have produced artificially, is in many districts a common<br />

plant, although it very seldom bears a single fruit, and is usually<br />

altogether sterile. Frequent hybridization, however, is not a general<br />

rule among our brambles. On the contrary, hybrid brambles,<br />

which are not procreated by one of the few species named above,<br />

are of rather rare occurrence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!