01.05.2013 Views

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138 NOTES OM PONDWEEDS.<br />

this view is not supported by its local distribution, nor by its leafstructure<br />

and habit of growth, which latter is that of F. perfoUatus.<br />

This origin is also rendered highly improbable by the early flowering<br />

of P. prtBlomjus, which is usually in fruit by<br />

flowers of P. hicms begin to expand.<br />

the time the first<br />

Although mature fruit of P. decijnens is never produced, yet<br />

isolated plants which are apparently seedlings are not unfrequently<br />

found in remote localities, to which it is almost impossible that ofl"sets<br />

of living plants could be carried by natural means. In<br />

these situations a single plant only is usually found, which often<br />

presents some slight individual peculiarity sufficient to distinguish<br />

it alike from the type, or from other local forms. These plants are<br />

always found growing with the supposed parents ; I have never<br />

met with them in localities where Lucimfi and perfuliams were not<br />

present. In waters where P. decipiens grows more abundantly it<br />

occupies large spaces or beds, evidently by the extension of the<br />

strong- growing rootstock ; each of these beds is composed of plants<br />

which do not vary year after year, but it will often happen that three<br />

or four beds, each tenanted by a slightly differing variety, occur iu the<br />

space of a few yards, too near for local causes to produce variation,<br />

and yet so constantly distinct as to induce the belief that each bed of<br />

plants is the produce of a diflerent seed. Under cultivation, as far<br />

as I have been able to observe, local forms of P. decipiens remain<br />

very constant, which is not the case with those of some species of<br />

FoUniKHjeton. Although these facts are not conclusive proofs of a<br />

hybrid origin for P. decipiens, they present an accumulated weight of<br />

evidence which is difficult to rebut.<br />

Before I thoroughly knew this plant I frequently passed it<br />

over in its early states as P. liicens, or when in flower as 1\ per-<br />

foliatus. It resembles the latter species in tbe lower stipules expanded<br />

into ear-like leaves towards the tip, and in the lower leaves,<br />

which are nurruw and. slif/htli/ stalked in butJi species, although rarely<br />

present in this state. The alliances, and probably the origin, of<br />

the species of Futamorjeton must be sought in their early stages,<br />

which often present features which entirely disappear with the<br />

growth of the plant. Thus stipules with adnate leaves are<br />

frequently met with on young stems of most species of Futamoffeton,<br />

while in P. pectinatiis, belonging to a group characterised by<br />

adnate leaves, the lower leaf is often merely sessile !<br />

I am indebted to Dr. Tiselius, of [Stockholm, for a very<br />

beautiful series of Swedish forms of F. decipiens, and he expresses<br />

a very decided opinion that this species is the same as F. salicifolius<br />

of Wolfgang, of which he possesses an original specimen<br />

which agrees iu all respects with a form named by him 1'. uj^saliensis.<br />

Dr. TiseHus labels a plant which is exactly like our fenland<br />

decipiens,<br />

" POTAMOGETON UPSALIENSIS Milli.<br />

= salici/ulius Wolfg.<br />

= litliiianicHs Gorski.<br />

= lanccolatus Reich, non Sm.<br />

Omnes fornue /'. decipientis Noltc."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!