01.05.2013 Views

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>31</strong>5<br />

SHORT NOTES.<br />

Ceepis nic^ensis Balb., in Beds.—This species lias occurred in<br />

great abundance during the spring and early summer of this year,<br />

in various parts of South Beds. It appears to have been introduced<br />

with foreign grass seeds, as it has been observed chiefly in<br />

pasture lands that have been recently laid down, whence it has<br />

been distributed to railway banks and occasionally to W'aste ground.<br />

It was first noticed in May, when walking through a field, its<br />

rosette of leaves and immature inflorescence arresting one's attention,<br />

as being unlike anything one had observed before. Not being<br />

able to make it agree with any species of Crepis in Hooker's<br />

' Student's Flora,' specimens were sent to Mr. Baker, named<br />

doubtfully as C. biennis, but that gentleman expressed the opinion<br />

that it was C. incacnsis Balb. Subsequently it was noticed in<br />

many fields, in the parishes of Leagrave, Toddington, Stopsley,<br />

and Totternhoe. Mr. C. Crouch also found it in several places<br />

near Pullox Hill. James Saunders.<br />

Brachypodiuji pixnatuji in Bucks. — Specimens of this plant<br />

have been sent me by Mrs. John Tindall, of Leighton, who found<br />

them in a field between the Soulbury Road and Linslade, at the<br />

back of a farm house on the Liscombe estate. This is not<br />

recorded for Bucks in the 2nd ed. of Watson's ' Topographical<br />

Botany.' James Saunders.<br />

Hypnum circinale.—In his note on Hijpnum circinale (p. 238),<br />

Mr. McArdle is puzzled to know why I take it for any form of H.<br />

hamuLomm . He must surely have misunderstood M. Cardot's note,<br />

for I quite agreed with that eminent bryologist, that the moss<br />

named by Moore H. hamidosum did not belong to that species, but<br />

very probably was H. circinale, as M. Cardot supposed. It is quite<br />

as probable that it is Stereodon c(m(ine7isis Mitt., with which I had<br />

not at the time an opportunity to compare it ; but I am very much<br />

puzzled to understand how Mr. McArdle can refer Stereodon<br />

canariensis Mitt., which had no existence as a botanical species<br />

before Nov. 6th, 1863 (Journ. Linn. Soc. Bot. viii. 5) to Lencodon<br />

canariensis (Brid.) Schwaeg., seeing that the Dilleniau figure he<br />

quotes represents even a larger plant than the adjoining figure 40,<br />

our great Ilijloconiium loreion. The geographical distribution<br />

of some of the species mentioned is also not particularly remarkable,<br />

and Cawpylopus introjlexus is widely distributed throughout<br />

the whole world, between the Alps in the north and Tasmania in<br />

the southern hemisphere.—R. l^RAiTinvAriE.<br />

Helianthemum guttatum in Anglesea. — With llelianthemnm<br />

which was abundant over a limited area near Holyhead, I<br />

Brewcri ,<br />

gathered two or three specimens of 11. (juttatuni Mill. The specimens<br />

were more luxuriant than Dreueri, and were quite cbractcate ;<br />

the leaves were somewhat broader than those on my Jersey plants.<br />

Mr. J. G. Baker says he shoulil consider it typical //. (juttatuni.—<br />

G. C. Druce.<br />

Trientalis europ^a in Foula.—During a brief visit to Foula,<br />

one of the most remote of the Shetland Islands, I noticed Trientalis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!