01.05.2013 Views

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 31 MB - BSBI Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68 NOTES ON THE BRITISH CHARACE.E FOR 1887-9.<br />

the name of X. hatracliosperma :—Forma typica, 4l-& cm. \\\g\.\,i\\e<br />

plant from near Berlin with very dense whorls, the upper being<br />

closely aggregated; /. maxima, a plant from Mannheim, 15 cm.<br />

high, which is described as resembling a large lax form of N.<br />

temdssima ; f. fallax, 8 cm. high, a lax plant almost resembling<br />

N. fjracilis ; f. minor, from Baden, which is much like our form<br />

and that from Sweden. The species is placed by Braun among the<br />

'' Glceocarpa," but in our form the presence of any gelatinous<br />

covering to the fruit is sometimes very doubtful. Dr. Nordstedt,<br />

when identifying our plant with the Scandinavian N. hatrachospcrma,<br />

suggests a doubt as to the correctness<br />

one of the " Glceocarpce."<br />

of regarding the species as<br />

The name N. hatracliosperma is generally adopted for this species,<br />

but it is quite untenable. Xitella batracliosperma was described by<br />

Agardh in 1824 (Syst. Alg. p. 126) when he founded the genus,<br />

quoting the synonym " C. batrachosperma, Dec, Thuill." Thuillier's<br />

jjlant has since been identified by Braun as a form of his Charn<br />

fcetida [C. vulfjaris), and, whatever plant Agardh had in view, there<br />

is no doubt that it was not the present species. The name<br />

Chara hatracliosperma was first used by Weiss for Batrachospcrmum<br />

vioniliforme. Braun's action in starting a new .Y. batrachosperma<br />

upon the foundation of Reichenbach's confused ideas, instead of<br />

giving an entirely new name, is incomprehensible, considering the<br />

slight grounds upon which he re-christened so many species. In<br />

the absence of any valid name for the species, Ave are reluctantly<br />

compelled, in accordance with the " Laws," to give it a name, and<br />

we think we cannot do better than dedicate it to the greatest living<br />

authority on the genus.<br />

We are indebted to our friend Mr. J. Guardia for photomicrographs<br />

of the surfaces of the two oospores whicli are copied on<br />

our plate. The importance of the markings on the surface of the<br />

oospore as a specific character has been well shown by Dr. Nordstedt<br />

in his recent valuable paper on the subject.<br />

N. GRACILIS, A

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!